Aug 13, 2020

Can one person hoist a resident by themselves?

 

A HelloCare reader recently asked if two people are required to use a hoist when moving an aged care resident, or if it’s okay to use a hoist on your own.

Though many of our readers insisted that two people are always required by their employer, there were others who said they have been successfully hoisting their clients or aged care residents alone without problem for years.

The online conversation has prompted HelloCare to take a look into this issue, another one of the troublesome ‘grey areas’ we seem to come across so often in aged care, where different guidance and different practices across the industry can cause confusion and uncertainty.

We also consider the question of what happens when busy staff are unable to find someone to help them use the hoist, and the need to move the resident is urgent, for example if they need to use the toilet? We have heard of residents being left for hours until staff are available to use the hoist. Both of these situations can create the risk of a loss of dignity for the resident.

What is a hoist?

A hoist is a mechanical lifting device that can be used to move those with poor mobility or who need a high degree of help with transfers, for example from a chair to the toilet, or from bed to a chair.

Hoists are often used in an aged care setting because as part of maintaining a safe workplace, aged care employers have a ‘no lift’ policy to protect staff from developing injuries that may arise from lifting or moving their care recipients. 

There are various types of hoists, including free-standing hoists and ceiling hoists.

Some hoists are designed to be used by two people, but there are hoists that have been specially designed to be used by one person.

Go solo, or wait for help?

According to Work Safe Victoria, two people are usually required to use a hoist.

For example, in their guidelines for transferring people to the toilet or into the bath using a hoist and sling, Work Safe Vic recommends “two or more workers” are required.

The recommendations may vary slighting from state to state, but the nation-wide ‘no lift’ policy means hoists – and two staff members – are generally recommended.

Having two staff members means staff are less likely to strain or injure themselves.

Some hoists are designed to have two people operate them, and have manual parts that require one person to operate the hoist while another person handles the person being moved.

However, some hoists are designed to be operated by one person, and in these situations, given both the employer and the care recipient agree, a single person can operate the hoist and move the person on their own.

Uniting NSW.ACT Executive Manager (Ageing) – Practice Excellence, Lana Richards, told HelloCare that different needs require different solutions, and every case is assessed according to its own circumstances. 

“Each resident/client has individual needs and Uniting engages physiotherapists to assess and determine their appropriate manual handling requirements. 

“This includes identifying the type of equipment and how many people are necessary to support safe transfers. 

“An environmental risk assessment is conducted to ensure the equipment can be used safely and staff are rostered appropriately depending on the assessed need.”

Preserving dignity when staff are rushed off their feet

We know that aged care workers are often rushed off their feet, so what happens when two staff aren’t available and the need to transfer the person is urgent?

Work Safe Vic recommends that aged care employees develop systems that mean two workers are always available.

“Develop and implement a system so the transfer of a person will not proceed until a second worker is available,” the guide recommends.

Similarly, the WorkCover Queensland suggests, “Where the use of a hoist requires two or more people, provide adequate supervision and resources to eliminate the risk of workers being under time pressure and attempting the task on their own.”

But how feasible is this? Sometimes waiting for two staff to become available can leave residents waiting for hours to be moved. 

Hoists in the home

Hoists can be used in the home too, and the same recommendations apply. Of course, employing two staff to use the hoist adds to the cost of delivering care.

What is your experience of using hoists in aged care? Have you used hoists alone, or do you always ensure you have another person with you?

Image: DGLimages, iStock.

This article was edited to include a comment from Uniting NSW.ACT.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. under adhc in the past 1 person was often used for hoisting in homecare then a new a new wave of thought came in and all services were converted to 2 person jobs. this cost to the clients package and the provider created a new look at profitable services along with the demands of high needs clients. Now the privitisation of our industry has created another problem the ejection of ndis clients out of the larger providers into a myriad of small operater agencies with low overheads now milking the system supported by the government and taxpayer money. These clients often had deep attachments to their long term careworkers some upward of 20 years and felt safe….now after being forced to leave and find other providers their world has changed and not always for the best. a lot of these ndis clients are now over 65 the charges nowadays are frightening in the race to make profits. yet the carworkers are still paid low wages and have insecure work and this still hasn’t been addressed. the whole sector is a mess. aged care and ndis are connected because the money is still coming from the govt and taxpayer dollars.

  2. I used a hoist in the home for three years. It was never a problem. I definitely did not need another person to help even though I was always grateful when another person was there. It may depend on the condition of the person being hoisted. The hoist was our greatest asset in the home.

  3. Surely rather than mandating numbers via a bureaucratic approach, and given that we hear repeatedly about person centred care [never a feature of bureaucracies although they preach it often], the concept of risk assessment of the situation, for the benefit of the elder and those providing the care, is the best approach?

  4. Have usually hoisted with 2 people, especially with full body and ceiling hoists, being safety for resident,safety for carer, ease of movement and security of person being hoisted is paramount, standing machines altho usually stated should be 2 people in my experience are quite often used by 1 person, once again depending on the person’s being moved around,I think of utmost importance in these situations is to make absolutely sure all slings are corectly fitted and attached and thorough training has taken place which of course is another who lie issue!!!

  5. 2 poorly trained inexperienced staff members on a hoist verses one experienced we trained competent staff member on a hoist is much safer , I have seen some very dangerous lifts lately from an agency who was supposed to provide trained staff

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Fired for refusing flu vaccine: Sacked worker set to take case to Federal Court

An aged care receptionist will take her case to the Federal Court, challenging this week’s decision by the Fair Work Commission that her employer acted fairly when it fired her for refusing the flu vaccination. Read More

$17.5 Billion of Taxpayer’s Money Spent on Aged Care Services: Money Well Spent?

Aged care is becoming more of an inevitable future for many Australians. We’re living longer and developing more complex health conditions needing extra assistance at home and in aged care. But are you aware of how much of the tax payers money is spent on aged care?  or exactly how many aged care workers are in... Read More

Aged Care Cameras Clear Carer of Assault Charges

Security cameras in aged care is a complex debate between safety and security and the residents’ right to privacy. One of the biggest arguments for camera installations is that it protects residents from elder abuse – as they would catch footage as evidence in what would otherwise be a case of the carer’s word against... Read More
Advertisement