Sep 27, 2019

Costs rising more quickly than revenue for listed aged care providers

Expenses grew more quickly than revenue last financial year at Australia’s three publicly listed aged care providers, meaning profitability was lower. 

Revenue was boosted by a one-off government subsidy, which won’t be available next year, and the costs of direct care, compliance, and the royal commission added to expenses.

Revenues at Regis, Japara and Estia, which together account for more than 15,000 aged care beds in Australia, rose 8.3 per cent, driven largely by the opening of new facilities. However, if you remove the government’s one-off subsidy, revenue was up only 6.4 per cent, according to aged care accountants and consultants, StewartBrown

The one-off subsidy from the government amounted to $10.3 million for Estia, $7.9 million for Japara, and $10.8 million for Regis.

Cost of staff rising

The cost of staff is the most significant expense for all three providers, and all three saw the expense rise over the year, according to the StewartBrown report.

At Estia, staff costs as a percentage of operating revenue increased 1.3 percentage points to 67.2 per cent. 

At Regis, the figure was up 0.5 percentage points to 70.4 per cent.

And staff costs as a percentage of operating revenue were steady at Japara at around 71.5 per cent.

Earnings have “fallen significantly”

When the government’s additional funding is removed from the results, earnings before tax per bed per annum (EBT pbpa) have “fallen significantly for all three listed providers”, according to StewartBrown.

The results indicate that “the growth in revenue cannot keep up with the growth in costs”.

At Estia’s, EBT pbpa decreased by $1,316 to $9.375 pbpa.

At Japara, EBT pbpa fell $1,427 to $4,429 pbpa.

And at Regis, EBT pbpa dropped $3,915 to $11,209 pbpa.

Royal commission adding to costs

The costs of complying with the royal commission also impacted the bottom line.

At Estia, the cost of preparing for the royal commission amounted to $1.7 million, at Japara the cost was $1.8 million, and Regis spent $2.0 million.

Occupancy declining

As is being seen across the industry, occupancy rates were down.

Estia’s occupancy rate fell from 94.2 per cent to 93.6 per cent. Japara’s occupancy dropped from 93.2 per cent to 92.9 per cent. And Regis saw its occupancy rate decline from 93.4 per cent to 92.7 per cent.

New homes behind increases in revenue

During the year, Estia opened one new home, and its number of ‘operational places’ increased by 56 to 6,102.

Japara’s operational places increased by 166 to 4,235, and Regis’s number of operational places jumped 325 to 7,078. Regis has approximately 600 new places in the pipeline.

Government subsidies account for between 70 and 75 per cent of revenues at the three providers.

The results reflect the trends occurring across the industry, lower occupancy rates, higher costs, and the compounding pressures of the royal commission. 

StewartBrown’s ‘Aged Care Financial Performance Survey’ will be released in October.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Oakden Corruption Report: South Australia’s “Shameful Chapter”

The independent report into the Oakden Aged Care scandal that has had everyone in the South Australian government, as well as the aged care sector, on their toes has finally been released. Oakden Older Persons Mental Health Service was shut down after it was found that they were mistreating and abusing their dementia patients. It... Read More

Emotional Exhaustion: The Importance of Self Care When Caring for Others

When caring for another person – whether it be your elderly father, frail grandmother or a resident in aged care – the priority tends to be the other person. Which is completely understandable, they are in need of help and you can offer them the help they need. Most carers will tell you that it... Read More

Department of Heath issues coronavirus updates for aged care workers

In residential aged care facilities, face shields or other protective eyewear (such as goggles) should be worn for the routine care of suspected, probable or confirmed cases of COVID-19. Guidance on the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in areas with significant community transmission is available on the Department's website. The risk of COVID-19 from transmission via the eye is unknown. However, as the predominant mode of transmission is via droplets, eye (and conjunctival) protection should be worn until further evidence emerges. Read More
Advertisement