The phrase “person-centred care” is so frequently used in aged care that it has become little more than a marketing slogan.
Every provider claims to offer it, yet in reality, many aged care environments are still driven by rigid routines, task-focused workflows, and systemic barriers that prevent true person-centred care from being implemented.
As dementia care expert David Sheard has observed, the term has been hijacked to the point of meaninglessness – every organisation boasts of “best practice” care, yet few live up to these claims.
Registered nurse and clinical educator Michael Page believes that the root of this disconnect lies in workplace culture. Leadership is often detached from frontline workers, staffing levels are stretched thin, and compliance demands overshadow meaningful care.
To bridge this gap, Page argues that aged care providers must invest in cultural change, ensuring that leadership engages directly with staff, empowering them to deliver genuine person-centred care.
One of the fundamental issues affecting workplace culture in aged care is the distance between leadership and frontline staff.
Page notes that in large organisations, whether not-for-profit or private, “managers of homes report into group managers, and then head office,” creating a structure where those making decisions have minimal direct contact with those delivering care.
This disconnect fosters a reactive rather than proactive approach to leadership. “When there’s been a Commission visit and the Commission have asked difficult questions, the blame – whether intentional or not – falls on the carers,” Page explains.
“The perception is that carers are not working properly, but the real issue is a lack of leadership, direction, and vision.”
Without clear leadership and consistent guidance, care workers often default to a task-oriented approach.
“If you’re working an afternoon shift and there are two of you for 30 or 40 residents, many of whom require two or even three-person assistance, how can you realistically be person-centred?” Page asks. “The focus becomes completing tasks efficiently rather than truly engaging with residents.”
This shift towards task-driven care is exacerbated by ever-changing managerial priorities. Staff become confused and revert to the safest, most efficient way of working, which prioritises routine over individualised care.
Instead of blaming care workers, Page argues, providers should acknowledge systemic barriers and implement practical solutions that empower staff to deliver person-centred care.
A critical step towards cultural change is for leadership to engage directly with staff and understand their challenges.
“If you want to be person-centred for your residents, you have to be person-centred for your teams,” Page asserts. While it may not be realistic for a CEO to be on the floor daily, senior leaders within the organisation should make an effort to be present and supportive.
“Even clinical nurses, or clinical educators, which I have been, find it difficult to get out on the floor. But that was my approach, and I think that’s the only way to develop a culture—go and talk to your people, find out their pain points, and actually listen to them,” Page says.
“Deliver one or two of their requests. Often, their requests aren’t about money. They might ask for more time for handover or a chance to sit and have a cup of tea with a resident. These small changes can make a big difference.”
A common argument against increasing time for engagement is staffing limitations. Providers often claim they lack the funds to hire more staff, creating a vicious cycle where workers feel rushed, frustrated, and unable to provide quality care.
Page acknowledges the funding complexities but believes many organisations choose to prioritise compliance and administration over frontline staffing.
“Many not-for-profits pour their surpluses into compliance teams instead of investing in extra staff or activities for residents,” he says. “My view has always been that if you get the care right in the first place, you don’t need to worry about the Commission. Provide good care from the bottom up, and you’ll start to embed a culture that people want to work in.”
Retaining experienced staff is also crucial for cultural stability, yet many aged care workers feel undervalued and unsupported. Overseas workers, in particular, are often seen as transient, with little effort made to integrate them into a positive workplace culture.
According to Page, they are often undervalued and expected to simply “follow the policy” rather than bring their authentic selves to work.
Page highlights a prevailing bias: “Many Australians, particularly older residents, would prefer an Australian-born carer. This is often attributed to communication difficulties, particularly for residents with hearing impairments.
However, when you consider that 60-70% of aged care residents have dementia – a number that is only going to increase – the ability to communicate empathy and care through body language and emotional intelligence is far more important than perfect English.”
Despite this, many providers fail to support and integrate their overseas staff effectively.
“They’re not trusted enough, they’re not empowered, and they’re often set up to fail by being expected to document everything in compliance-language, even when English is their second language.”
However, Page has seen firsthand how embracing diversity can strengthen workplace culture.
“At one home I worked for, the residents loved the multicultural aspect of their carers. On one shift, we staff members of 40 nationalities. When a beloved resident passed away, 20 of our staff attended her funeral, and her family called them the ‘United Nations of Care.’”
Instead of treating diversity as a challenge, providers should celebrate it. “It shouldn’t be a once-a-year token cultural event; it should be embedded in the daily life of the home. When staff are encouraged to bring their cultural identities to work, it fosters a sense of belonging and strengthens team morale.”
Aged care providers often operate within a “vanilla” culture of compliance—meeting minimum standards without striving for excellence.
Page recalls a conversation with a CEO of a large organisation who made a shocking admission.
“I said that in aged care, 20% of homes are exemplars, 10% are awful, and 70% are just ticking compliance boxes,” Page recalls. ” He agreed and, while he has bold plans for the future, actually admitted to the aged care part of the organisation being in the ‘vanilla” category”.
To break out of this mediocrity, providers need to prioritise ethical leadership and invest in staff development.
“Many aged care managers tell me they love dementia care and have completed specialist training, yet they won’t fund training for their staff. They staff memory support units inappropriately and unsafely. There’s a real disconnect between what they say and what they do.”
Aged care leadership should be about more than just business acumen. “A CEO doesn’t have to be an expert in everything, but they need to pick the right team,” Page emphasises.
“Unfortunately, many good people are promoted into high-paying roles and then simply follow the party line, focused on hitting KPIs rather than fostering a culture of care.”
The industry needs leaders who prioritise people – both residents and staff – over financial metrics. True person-centred care requires an organisational shift where care quality is seen as the foundation of success, rather than an afterthought.
Improving workplace culture in aged care is not just about better policies or compliance; it requires active leadership, investment in staff, and a commitment to putting care before bureaucracy.
As Page highlights, “Provide good care, and you don’t need a whole backroom of people trying to get you out of trouble – you’ll already be doing the right thing.”
Michael Page co-hosts the With All Due Respect podcast alongside Creative Elder Engagement Specialist Maurie Voisey-Barlin, where they explore aged care topics as part of the Open The Doors 2030 knowledge-sharing movement, of which they are both co-founders.
Totally agree
Hello Team
As an age care receiver I couldn’t agree more with the comments and situation that exists in the caring of the older generation.
I am a single 79 year old ex CEO of a company. I had been working full time up until 2 years ago when I was faced with having leukemia and had to retire.
I had never received any assistance at home and had been completely independent for 25 years. After being Age Care accessed i received a Home Care Package which consisted of weekly home cleaning… reduced transport cost… and home maintenance where the labour cost is subsidised.
This was to enable me to stay in my own home.
However some twelve months into my care the problems faced with having to make sure the services are received has been nothing short of a nightmare at times. Time management seems to be no existence as is communication.
Trying to contact the organisation concerned is distressing as it is. One organisation on investigation has 20 Directors each with so many degrees that it reads like a university yet none of these degrees in many cases are connected to a Age Care Industry and their position of employment is ambiguous.
Government are pouring taxpayers money into the Age Care Industry which is still not delivering the proper due care for the ageing population by Age Care Providers spending money in wasted areas or inflating job costs to create a false impression of financial savings.
For example a Lawn Mowing business through a provider quote $120 to mow your lawn less a $40 voucher provided. In the private sector a quote to mow the same lawn is $60. The same applies to home maintenance work.
There have been so many NEW Age Care Providers in the Industry all promising the best of care and services to keep old age folk in their own homes when in actual fact the cost to do this and the standard of care is forcing older folk OUT of there comfort zone causing them more stress and extra health issues where depression is becoming a wider problem.
Very very concerned.
In amongst all of this, over the last 20 years we have seen a massive increase in the recording and documentation of everything, not only in aged care, but also in hospitals. The obsession with information recording has negatively impacted the ability and time all levels of staff have to actually spend time with and interact with residents and patients. Providers have finite levels of funds that can be used to operate an aged care business. So when a facility has to collect information and report on 14 clinical indicators, staff and resident practice and satisfaction often done manually then the reality is that face to face time will suffer because all resources are finite. And so it will only get worse.
This is not surprising and has been happening in residential care for years, person centred care is ‘dressed up’ to look as though older people individual needs are being met when in reality it falls below par. There is a serious lack of good leadership, aged care homes reflect who is at the helm. I have seen homes that are run very poorly to become exemplars of care as you phrased it just by changing DON OR Director of Care who truly foster a inclusive workplace focused on the needs of residents and staff. One of the main contributors to this issue is the lack of mandatory training for staff, Carers need to have a Cert 3 level qualification at least to be able to perform their work to a minimum standard. Without good mentoring and leadership, carers are given the ‘bare mimimum’ of training, they lack the essential skills and knowledge to provide care that is person centred and compassionate. Providers are not interested in spending money or resources to train staff, the residents are the ones that bear the brunt of this. We have missed a valuable opportunity to legislate a minimum Cert 3 qual for all care workers when the new Aged Care Act was recently passed. This will not create change as proposed by the government and industry.
I am happy, thank you for naming these shambles
Same does apply to Agedcare service sector and providers.
I have am in conflict with my provider for 7 years, I have been told that I can choose another provider.
My answer, “you are all the same.” Their catch phrase is “Moving forward” only one problem is, they never move an inch and continue to create pain to old people
Thank you for validating what I have been thinking for a long time…..