Jun 21, 2018

Aged care ‘serious risk’ warnings have more than doubled this year

The number of ‘serious risk’ notices that have been issued so far this year by the Australian Aged Care Quality Agency is already more than twice the number issued last year.

A ‘serious risk’ notice is issued if an aged care home fails to meet one of the industry’s 44 standards, and the chief executive of the AACQA believes there is evidence the failure puts, or may put, the safety, health or wellbeing of a resident at risk.

From July last year until the end of May, there were 48 ‘serious risk’ notices issued to aged care providers, up from only 22 for the whole of the previous financial year, according to Channel 10 News.

These notices have been issued before the 1 July introduction of unannounced audits, and are likely to rise further once they are introduced.

So far this financial year, 14 aged care providers have also been sanctioned for failing to meet a timetable for improvement, and nine have had their accreditation revoked, according to Channel 10 News.

When aged care facilities lose their accreditation they lose significant government funding.

Unannounced re-accreditation visits: cracking down on standards

The government is introducing tougher measures to monitor aged care quality with the introduction of unannounced re-accreditation checks from 1 July this year.

Currently, aged care audit visits are usually conducted by appointment, although unannounced visits do sometimes occur.

AACQA Chief Executive Nick Ryan told The Australian that the regulator has channeled more resources into regulation and monitoring of risks, which has contributed to the increase of non-compliance findings.

“Over recent years the Australian Aged Care Quality Agency has strengthened its risk based regulatory approach to ensure the aged care sector meets standards for safety and quality care,” he said.

“A risk-based approach means directing more regulatory resources to areas of greatest risk based on information and intelligence. Our focus in compliance monitoring has been on areas of known risk and previous noncompliance.

“These factors have contributed to an increase in findings of noncompliance as reflected in our performance data.”

HelloCare’s request for a comment from the AACQA was not answered at the time of publishing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Tears For Ann-Marie: Disability Advocate Sheds Light On A History of Neglect

When police read out the details of Ann Marie Smith’s death at a press conference on May 15th, the words of South Australian Police’s Detective Superintendent, Des Bray, shed light on an existence that was far too tragic for the public to ignore. With Ms Smith’s carer, Rosa Maione, the subject of a manslaughter investigation,... Read More

Bupa Seaforth has sanctions extended

Bupa Seaforth has had its sanctions extended and will have its accreditation revoked if it can not demonstrate to the Quality Commission it is at least on the path to full compliance. “Ongoing concerns” In an audit on 2 May 2019, Bupa Seaforth failed to meet 18 of the expected quality outcomes. On 10 June... Read More

Nursing home sanctioned after failing all eight quality standards

  An aged care facility in Lake Macquarie, New South Wales, has been sanctioned until early April after failing all of the eight aged care quality standards. Not-for-profit provider South Cross Care’s Tenison Swansea Residential Aged Care has been sanctioned until 3 April 2020 for failing elements of all eight of the new person-centred quality... Read More
Advertisement