Jan 19, 2017

‘Aged of Entitlement’ shows Older Australians pay less tax than Young People

A recent Grattan Institute report has shown that older Australians pay about $1 billion a year less tax than younger Australian with identical incomes.

Previously, it was approximately between one quarter and one third of seniors who paid tax. However this has now decreased to less than half of that – making it around one eighth of seniors still paying tax.

The tax decreases began with the Low Income Aged Persons Rebate, followed by the Senior Australians Tax Offset. After that their superannuation became tax free.

To better understand the situation the report, titled “Age of Entitlement”, compared two couples; “James and Linda” who are over 65, and “Michael and Jenny” who around 40.

Both couples earn the same combined taxable income of $70 000. James and Linda from superannuation and investments and Michael and Jenny from wages. The older couple hold two Commonwealth Seniors’ Health Cards and pays $4049 in tax. The younger couple, who also have a higher Medicare levy, pay $6894.

There have also been calls to alter measures to save the government $1 billion a year. This would include changes to Seniors and Pensioners Tax Offset, Medicare levy income threshold available for seniors, and private health insurance rebates which are only available to older Australians.

These proposed changes are most likely to affect seniors who are wealthy enough to receive no (or a part) pension. The changes would have little effect on the 40 percent of seniors who currently receive a full Age Pension.

The issue isn’t necessarily that the older couple haven’t paid their taxes, it’s the amount which is causing discussions.

The older generation over time would have paid less tax than the generation after them. While they are getting taxed less, their incomes have been increasing and the amount the government spend on seniors in the health sector is also increasing. Essentially what the adds up to is that they are taking more money out and putting less in.

Since the release of the report, it has raised discussions around whether or not seniors are taking too much from the public purse – or rather is it basic human right to be looked after as you reach your twilight years regardless of your tax contribution?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sydney Aged Care Royal Commission hearing begins on Monday

Media Release: Royal Commission The Royal Commission’s next public hearing will run over two weeks in Sydney, commencing on 6 May 2019. At the hearing the Royal Commission will inquire into the quality and safety of residential aged care, with a focus on care for people living with dementia. Australia’s population is ageing and there... Read More

Will Aged Care Even Exist in the Future?

The UN predicts that by 2030, one in six people will be over the age of 60. If you ask people from the industry, and even the general public, most will say the same thing – that aged care is booming. As the ageing population in Australia grows, you would think that that would mean... Read More

102-year-old told to provide proof-of-age documents or lose pension

Centrelink has ordered a 102-year old from Punchbowl, in the heart of Sydney’s outbreak, to provide proof-of-age documents or have her pension cut off. Read More
Advertisement
Exit mobile version