Nov 14, 2024

Elderly Man Dies via Euthanasia After Prolonged Delay in Receiving Home Care

Elderly Man Dies via Euthanasia After Prolonged Delay in Receiving Home Care

The passing of Cyril Tooze, an 86-year-old from the Adelaide Hills, has brought attention to Australia’s aged care system and its impact on elderly Australians waiting for essential support.

Cyril’s decision to pursue Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) came after months of waiting for in-home care, which he had been approved for but never received. His story sheds light on the challenges faced by many older Australians caught in delays and backlogs, waiting for the critical assistance they need to remain safe and comfortable at home.

Earlier this year, Cyril was granted a Level 4 Home Care Package—the highest level of care available under MyAgedCare, designed for individuals with complex needs.

However, due to high demand and staffing shortages, his wait for care stretched from an initial nine months into October. Meanwhile, Cyril, who had terminal heart and lung conditions, experienced a decline in his health.

With no close family nearby, he found himself alone in navigating the aged care system while managing the physical toll of his illnesses.

A fall at home led to hospitalisation, and Cyril’s health continued to worsen. Facing a wait with no clear end, he ultimately chose VAD, a legal option in South Australia for individuals with advanced, incurable conditions.

His passing brings attention to the challenges and emotional toll experienced by many elderly Australians waiting for care.

Federal MP Rebekha Sharkie, who advocated for Cyril, reflected on his strength. “To the very end, he wanted his situation to shed light and provide a human story for the 76,000 other older Australians who, just like him, are deteriorating, having accidents and injuring themselves while waiting for a Home Care package that they’ve been assessed as needing,” she said.

Sharkie’s comments point to a larger issue within the aged care system, where thousands are waiting for services that have already been assessed as critical to their well-being.

Aged Care Minister Anika Wells extended her condolences to Cyril’s family, underscoring the importance of stories like his in driving aged care reform.

“Our reforms include a $4.3bn investment in the new Support at Home program that will benefit around 1.4 million Australians by 2035,” she said. “That program is designed specifically to help older Australians remain independent, in their home and their community for longer.”

The program aims to reduce waiting times and increase access to tailored support, marking an ambitious step toward addressing the needs of the growing elderly population.

While these reforms offer a pathway to improvements, they also highlight the current pressures on Australia’s aged care system. Staffing shortages, rising demand, and the sheer scale of the waiting list show that more immediate action may be required to support those in need right now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. How in all consciene can anyone call this aged ‘care’.

    It is up to people and tge media to change the language. Govt and ibdustry looove the fake, gaslighting terms they feed to us. It is up to us to change the language from that rubbish rhetoric to accurate words

    If we don’t change all avenues that might enable change that benefits the aged will remain cut off.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Suspended officer faces court in person as requested by disgruntled judge

The police officer charged with allegedly fatally tasering 95-year-old Clare Nowland has been forced to face court in person for the first time as per the demands of the Magistrate judge. Read More

Could retirement villages be an affordable solution to the housing crisis?

Retirement villages appear to be the most affordable housing option for over 65s looking to move out of the family home, but supply issues could create a highly competitive market. Read More

4 key takeaways from the aged care royal commission’s final report

Over two years, through more than 10,500 submissions and 600 witnesses, the two commissioners heard extensive evidence of a system in crisis. Australians might have expected the commissioners to provide one streamlined blueprint for reform. But the commissioners diverged on a number of large and some smaller recommendations. This makes the already complex path to reform even more confusing. It reduces the power of the final report. More disappointingly, it gives the government room to pick and choose recommendations as the cabinet likes. Nonetheless, if the major recommendations are adopted, Australia will get a transformed aged care system over the next five years. Here are our top four takeaways from this landmark report. Read More
Advertisement