Sep 08, 2020

Omission of aged care staff from retention payment is “shameful”, CEO tells minister

 

The CEO of a New South Wales retirement village has called on the federal health minister and a local MP to explain to key aged care workers – a laundry supervisor, a cleaner, a grounds manager, a caterer, a maintenance officer, and a receptionist – why they are not entitled to the Aged Care Workers Retention Bonus.

The payment designed to support the workforce actually “divides” the workforce, wrote Shane Neaves, chief executive officer, Peninsula Villages, in a letter to aged care minister Richard Colbeck and Lucy Wicks MP, Member for Robertson.

“I openly invite you Senator and our local member to address the ‘non-direct care’ workers who have risked their own personal safety to work in the aged care sector and provide important interaction with our residents as to why they aren’t being rewarded.

Mr Neaves said the omission of these key staff from the payments was “shameful” and “just plain mean”.

A letter from the Department of Health in response fails to acknowledge the important contributions of these workers.

“The COVID-19 aged care retention bonus is a measure focused on the retention of direct care workers, recognising the particular role they play in the care of individuals,” Mr Colbeck wrote.

We have published the two letters below. 

Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Screen Shot 2020-09-08 at 11.30.12 am
Screen Shot 2020-09-08 at 11.30.27 am

Screen Shot 2020-09-08 at 11.30.42 am
Screen Shot 2020-09-08 at 11.33.33 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Where the money goes “…Healthcare for All?—[our $270B Defence budget]. Were [we] challenged by the but how will you pay for it question? No. Did taxpayers’ rates go up to pay for this military budget? No. Were other programs cut to fund this exorbitant investment in violence? No. That is not how it works….” https://americanethnologist.org/features/pandemic-diaries/post-covid-fantasies/reparative-public-goods-and-the-future-of-finance-a-fantasy-in-three-parts

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Government delivers 38 of 36,000 emergency food packages promised to elderly

The Morrison Government delivered just 38 emergency food packages to older Australians isolating because of COVID-19 after announcing it would deliver 36,000. This failure raises serious questions about how well the Government targeted and advertised this support for older Australians. It is very concerning that so few emergency food packages have been delivered by the... Read More

Banning visitors to aged care during coronavirus raises several ethical questions – with no simple answers

Physically, older people are among those most vulnerable to the coronavirus. For those isolated in residential aged care or in the community, they’re also arguably the most vulnerable socially. Reports from European and American care homes, where large clusters of residents have been infected, provide sobering reminders of the need to take precautions. But some... Read More

St Basil’s Homes for the Aged refutes claims of closure

St Basil’s Homes for the Aged in Victoria, the epicentre of one of the most deadly aged care COVID-19 outbreaks in Victoria, is on shaky ground after losing Commonwealth funding after the home was deemed “an immediate and severe risk” to the health and safety of residents. Read More
Advertisement