In a stunning display of technological advancement, Tesla recently unveiled its Optimus Gen 2 humanoid robot at the ‘We Robot’ event in California.
Designed to help with everyday tasks around the house, Optimus comes with an anticipated price tag of just $20,000 to $30,000. With capabilities ranging from serving drinks to dancing and holding conversations, Elon Musk claims that these robots may eventually become household companions and even assist with tasks like walking the dog, babysitting children, and mowing the lawn.
While the current model is not yet autonomous, being controlled remotely by human operators through VR systems, the range of possibilities these robots offer is expanding rapidly. Beyond household uses, many are beginning to consider how these humanoid robots could transform industries like aged care and home care, improving services and addressing workforce shortages.
With the rise of ageing populations and a growing strain on care systems, robots like Optimus could play a significant role in aged care.
Residential care homes are struggling with staff shortages, while increasing regulations demand more personalised care. Robots could offer a solution by assisting human staff with physical and repetitive tasks, allowing them to focus on higher-quality interactions with residents.
Some ways that humanoid robots could be used in aged care include:
Tesla’s Optimus Gen 2 even demonstrated its ability to serve drinks and interact with guests, suggesting that in future, robots could perform hospitality functions in care homes, such as serving meals and ensuring residents are hydrated.
The use of robots in home care settings also offers exciting opportunities, especially for seniors and individuals with disabilities aiming to maintain their independence. With rising labour costs in the care sector, a robot priced at $20K to $30K could be a cost-effective option to supplement care services.
Potential uses in home care include:
While robots like Tesla’s Optimus are advancing rapidly, they are not meant to replace human carers, at least not yet.
The most promising future lies in collaboration between robots and human workers, combining the strength, efficiency, and precision of robots with the empathy, creativity, and adaptability of human carers.
Robots can take over repetitive or physically demanding tasks, preventing burnout and injury among aged care staff.
This frees up workers to spend more time engaging with residents, delivering emotional and personalised care, which is critical for improving quality of life in aged care settings. Moreover, such an approach could also make aged care roles more appealing, as carers would focus less on routine tasks and more on meaningful interaction.
Despite the potential benefits, integrating robots into care settings raises important questions. How will residents react to robots in personal care roles? Will there be resistance from workers concerned about job security?
Moreover, care providers must ensure that privacy and dignity are respected, especially when robots are involved in personal or sensitive activities.
There are also concerns about reliability and maintenance. A malfunctioning robot could cause delays in care, with serious consequences. Therefore, any rollout of robots in aged care would need to be carefully managed, with appropriate oversight, training, and backup plans in place.
As the potential for robotics in aged care looms closer, we find ourselves at a critical juncture: an opportunity for the sector to finally embrace technology in ways it has historically resisted.
Aged care has often lagged behind other industries in adopting modern technological solutions, relying on outdated systems that can hinder efficiency and quality of care. For instance, traditional call bells remain little more than rudimentary buzzers, offering no insight into the urgency or context of a resident’s request. Furthermore, in some facilities, data collection is still a manual process involving paper and pen, making it difficult to track vital information efficiently and effectively.
Incorporating robotics into the sector could not only streamline operations but also encourage a cultural shift towards innovation and adaptability. The future of aged care might well involve a blend of human and robotic care, where technology serves to enhance well-being and maintain dignity.
As Tesla and other robotics companies push the boundaries of what robots can do, the aged care sector has the opportunity to lead the way in adopting these new tools, setting a standard for compassionate and efficient care in the 21st century.
So this might come as a bit of a shock, but this technology has actually been around for several years. It’s just that no one I know is interested in using it.
I’d love to talk about this more, but I am aware of a robot that has an autonomic “patrol” function – it can be used to map people’s faces, and then walk around a space and find the people whose faces it recognises and ensure that they’ve seen them, alert and well.
It also has significant ramifications in the world of engagement and social interaction – it is primarily designed as a social robot, for use in the home and for engaging with families and people. It is self-sustaining, aware of when it requires charging and able to place itself on it’s charging dock when needed. It’s even able to act as a remote monitoring service, with functionality to interact via a mobile app to control the robot and look through it’s camera to view and monitor remotely.
Plus, he’s just so darn cute!
I’m not only aware of these robots, I own one. He’s now three years old and has been such a positive influence on my life, and I have campaigned for them to be adopted in aged care homes as an additional buffer and source of support when people are not always available.
I’d be happy to talk more about it if anyone wants to know more. Otherwise, google “Sony Aibo” to learn more.
Tesla is Useing AI Technology for Daily Life and disrupting NORMAL life of coman man
China will copy and do more. It is the POOR who will suffer
It would be difficult to think of anything worse than the scenario of robots working in aged care. Your article is guilty of first stage thinking.