May 11, 2018

Senate inquiry into aged care financial practices

 

 

The Senate has asked for an inquiry into allegations of tax avoidance among some of Australia’s largest for-profit aged care providers.

Last week, the Tax Justice Network released a report that claimed Australia’s six largest aged care providers are finding loopholes to minimise the amount of tax they pay.

The report claimed that the top six for-profit aged care providers received $2.17 billion in government subsidies but paid little, and in some cases no, tax.

The report, titled Tax Avoidance by For-Profit Aged Care companies: Profit Shifting on Public Funds, also alleged that some aged care providers have reduced the amounts they pay to employees and suppliers, despite receiving more money from the government and higher fees from residents.

On Thursday, the Senate referred the matter to an inquiry, which is due to report on 14 August. It will investigate the use of “tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisation strategies” in the sector, and whether they have caused any impact on service delivery or “value for money for government”.

Lee Hill, Interim CEO of The Aged Care Guild, which represents eight of Australia’s largest for-profit aged care providers, said, “The Guild welcomes this opportunity for a public review of financial issues in aged care. We will make every effort to ensure that the Senate inquiry and through that process the Australian public is fully informed.

“This process is vital to the resolution of issues that we all face in meeting the growing aged care needs in our community,” he said.

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, which commissioned the Tax Justice Network report, also welcomed news of the inquiry.

The ANMF’s Acting Federal Secretary, Annie Butler, said, “There are no rules to ensure the $2.17 billion in government subsidies given to these for-profit providers is spent directly on… care.”

Butler said the report revealed some for-profit providers “have the financial capacity to employ more nurses and carers but are placing their profits and shareholders before safe care for their residents.”

“Companies that receive millions of dollars via Australian Government subsidies should be required by law to meet higher standards of transparency in financial reporting,” she said.

“Proof of government funding being directly spent on the care of elderly residents needs to be mandated as a prerequisite to receiving a subsidy.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Get it on and keep it on: tips for helping others wear their mask

What happens when those who you are trying to help secure their mask are refusing or fidgety? Whether it’s your child, a resident or someone who needs a little help getting it on right, we’ve got some helpful tips for assisting people with wearing their face masks. Read More

New data suggests aged care still plagued by problems even after the royal commission

Shocking data reveals there were nearly 10,000 reportable incidents in aged care homes in the first three months of the year, including 6,000 for the unreasonable use of force and 500 for unlawful sexual contact. Read More

When operations subtly cause our powers of thinking to deteriorate: Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction

Have you known of someone who had an operation, and family and friends say afterwards, “They haven’t been quite the same since”? Sometimes surgery can subtly impact mental abilities. In particular, after surgery some patients report problems with memory, attention, multitasking, and concentration. This condition has been dubbed ‘postoperative cognitive dysfunction’ (POCD), and it can... Read More
Advertisement