Why do we need two-litre continence pads?

Continence management is one of the most complex issues in residential aged care.

Incontinence is one of the top three reasons people enter residential aged care in the first place, according to studies.

And once in aged care, poorly managed incontinence can significantly impact on a person’s quality of life, and lead to loss of dignity, thereby contributing to poor mental health outcomes, says the Continence Foundation of Australia (CFA).

A study from 2011, found that 70.9% of Australian aged care residents had urinary or faecal incontinence, or both.

What do the aged care standards say?

Continence management is one of the Australian Aged Care Quality Agency’s standards.

Standard 2.12 requires that the ‘Care recipient’s continence is managed properly’. The standard is measured by the outcome for the resident: management must be able to show the facility’s continence management practices are meeting each resident’s needs.

However, in 2017, continence and bowel management was one of the top five reasons for complaints about residential aged care to the Aged Care Commissioner.

Rather than managing incontinence according to each resident’s needs, some experts say that aged care staff are turning to high-volume continence pads instead to ensure they are complying with the commonly used three-pad system.

The best way to manage incontinence

CFA CEO, Rowan Cockerell, told HelloCare, “Incontinence should never be accepted as normal for someone in residential care.”

“All incontinence problems should be assessed and managed.”

“It is important to understand that continence needs of every person differ and continence care needs to be tailored to the individual.”

“Pads should be changed as often as needed to keep the person dry and maintain their dignity.”

Why do we need continence pads that hold two or more litres?

Continence pads should be selected for each aged care resident according to their specific requirements, said Cockerell.

“Type and size of pad should be assessed to ensure the best product is chosen for the individual’s incontinence. Incontinence pads come in many sizes, shapes and capacities. There are pads that can hold up to two or more litres,” she said.

Pads that hold the largest volumes are generally for overnight use, said Cockerell.

“Choosing what size pad is needed for people would depend on the volume of urine that they pass overnight. Some people do not pass any urine, whereas others may pass two litres or more,” she said.

But Dr Rodney Jilek, Principal Adviser, Aged Care Consulting and Advisory Services, told HelloCare that often aged care staff focus more on the three-pad system employed in most facilities than on the individual requirements of each resident.

With continence pads seen as an expensive item, there is pressure on staff to use higher volume pads, he said.

“I have seen considerable pressure applied to operational staff to minimise care costs, and unfortunately incontinence aids are seen as a high-cost commodity that are easily targeted,” he said.

“There is certainly a common misconception that once incontinence aids are applied, the need for toileting ceases, which in turn requires the use of larger pads,” said Dr Jilek.

The problems associated with leaving pads on for long periods of time

According to Cockerell, if pads aren’t changed regularly enough, skin can become inflamed – resulting in redness, pain and itching – and sometimes even swelling, blisters, dryness or flaking.

The damaged skin is then vulnerable to infection, she said.

Cockerell said today’s continence pads are designed to keep the skin dry, to prevent some of the problems that can arise.

Dr Jilek said, “Leaving incontinence aids on too long often results in rashes, burning and contributes to impaired skin integrity, including the development of pressure ulcers.”

It is really possible to maintain your dignity while wearing a pad holding such a significant volume?

If you have questions questions about incontinence or continence aids, you can contact the National Continence Helpline on 1800 33 00 66 to speak confidentially to a continence nurse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. in some facilities they also put two pads on at a time.. why?? do they only go to the toilet three times a day, I think not, if they are using pads correctly and toileting when the client requests or as their schedule suggest or as they have been assessed, there would be less stress on the staff and client, evry person is different and every day can be different.

  2. It’s about costs and staffing. I have worked in aged care for many years. The three pad system is widely used and residents are assessed regarding toileting needs and continence aid provision. The issue is that staffing is inadequate and residents have to wait for extended periods to be assisted to the toilet.Some residents require 2 staff members.I have worked in places where at certain times of the day there is only one carer, therefore they are unable to toilet residents. I recently worked in a facility where residents were told that they would have to wait for the next shift to arrive before they could be taken to the toilet. The issue of resident /staff ratios needs urgent attention.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

“Square peg, round hole”: Why program design makes CHSP-Support at Home merger impossible

Is aged care reform heading in the wrong direction? Professor Kathy Eagar says folding CHSP into Support at Home ignores fundamental differences in funding design and risks harming 850,000 older Australians. Read More

I used to judge people who put their parents into aged care. Then dementia made me one of them

HelloCare's head of content, Jakob Neeland, admits he once judged families who chose aged care for their loved ones. Then it was his turn to make that decision, and everything he thought he knew changed. Read More

Ministers know CHSP must stay but won’t say so, as aged care reform chaos deepens

Senior ministers have privately told the aged care sector they want to keep the CHSP, but won't say so publicly. Meanwhile 840,000 older Australians and 1,300-plus providers are left in limbo. The political silence has a human cost. Read More
Advertisement