Sep 21, 2020

Victorian premier says staff ratios could have saved aged care during pandemic

 

The Victorian premier has weighed in to the debate about aged care staffing numbers, suggesting the federal government could have done more to prevent outbreaks in aged care facilities if it had implemented mandatory staff ratios in aged care homes.

In a press conference this morning, premier Daniel Andrews said his government is limited in what it can do in aged care, because the sector is funded and regulated by the federal government.

There have been almost 2,000 confirmed COVID-19 cases among aged care residents in Victoria since January, including over 600 deaths.

Despite the crisis, Mr Andrews said he is still hearing of casual staff working across multiple facilities.

But he said there is little his government can do to stop this from occurring, other than providing financial support for casual workers required to test and self-isolate.

Mr Andrews said the federal government could have done more to ensure private aged care facilities were better prepared for COVID-19 outbreaks.

“There’s a lot of things we could do, we could have nurse-to-patient ratios like we do in public aged care, but I do not have the power to do that,” the premier said.

Aged care homes across most of Australia do not have mandated staffing ratios, it is instead left to providers to determine what they believe to be the most appropriate staffing levels. 

However, aged care staff ratios are mandated in Queensland and Victoria.

In public aged care homes in Victoria, there must be one nurse for every seven residents in the morning, one for every eight in the afternoon, and one nurse for every 15 residents at night.

A report published in the Journal of the American Medical Association released last month, showed that in 4,255 aged care homes across eight states in the United States, those with more nurses had fewer cases of COVID-19.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Why face shields are useless if worn without a mask

You may well have seen people wearing clear plastic face shields instead of surgical or cloth face masks. While these are definitely more comfortable to wear, the question is: are they actually effective in slowing the spread of the virus? Read More

On the road out of the coronavirus crisis, let us not lose our humanity

You don’t have to read very far into the Aged Care Royal Commission’s interim report to get a clear sense of why our nation has sadly failed in the care of older Australians. In the first and second paragraphs of the report’s foreword an issue that has fed our tolerance for mistreatment and abuse in... Read More

Department of Heath issues coronavirus updates for aged care workers

In residential aged care facilities, face shields or other protective eyewear (such as goggles) should be worn for the routine care of suspected, probable or confirmed cases of COVID-19. Guidance on the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in areas with significant community transmission is available on the Department's website. The risk of COVID-19 from transmission via the eye is unknown. However, as the predominant mode of transmission is via droplets, eye (and conjunctival) protection should be worn until further evidence emerges. Read More
Advertisement