Jan 19, 2017

‘Aged of Entitlement’ shows Older Australians pay less tax than Young People

A recent Grattan Institute report has shown that older Australians pay about $1 billion a year less tax than younger Australian with identical incomes.

Previously, it was approximately between one quarter and one third of seniors who paid tax. However this has now decreased to less than half of that – making it around one eighth of seniors still paying tax.

The tax decreases began with the Low Income Aged Persons Rebate, followed by the Senior Australians Tax Offset. After that their superannuation became tax free.

To better understand the situation the report, titled “Age of Entitlement”, compared two couples; “James and Linda” who are over 65, and “Michael and Jenny” who around 40.

Both couples earn the same combined taxable income of $70 000. James and Linda from superannuation and investments and Michael and Jenny from wages. The older couple hold two Commonwealth Seniors’ Health Cards and pays $4049 in tax. The younger couple, who also have a higher Medicare levy, pay $6894.

There have also been calls to alter measures to save the government $1 billion a year. This would include changes to Seniors and Pensioners Tax Offset, Medicare levy income threshold available for seniors, and private health insurance rebates which are only available to older Australians.

These proposed changes are most likely to affect seniors who are wealthy enough to receive no (or a part) pension. The changes would have little effect on the 40 percent of seniors who currently receive a full Age Pension.

The issue isn’t necessarily that the older couple haven’t paid their taxes, it’s the amount which is causing discussions.

The older generation over time would have paid less tax than the generation after them. While they are getting taxed less, their incomes have been increasing and the amount the government spend on seniors in the health sector is also increasing. Essentially what the adds up to is that they are taking more money out and putting less in.

Since the release of the report, it has raised discussions around whether or not seniors are taking too much from the public purse – or rather is it basic human right to be looked after as you reach your twilight years regardless of your tax contribution?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

What You Should Know About Aged Care Facilities Charging Illegal ‘Asset Replacement’ and ‘Capital Refurbishment’ Fees

It was recently in the news the the Federal Court rules against aged care providers Regis Aged Care and Japara for charging their clients an “Asset Replacement Charge” fee. The Federal Court confirmed the Health Department’s previous advice that residential aged care providers cannot charge the additional service fees that are known variously as ‘asset... Read More

After losing her mother, this grandmother retrained in aged care and went back to work at 74

The single mother of three has multiple degrees, has worked in at least three different industries, and suffered the loss of a parent after years of being their carer. Read More

Caregiver’s dedication shines as she cares for her former boss

A dedicated carer with an impressive three-decade career in the same Warwick aged care home has come full circle by caring for the very woman who gave her the job 35 years ago. Read More
Advertisement