Jul 01, 2025

Caught in the middle: The care squeeze is crippling Australia’s sandwich generation

Women of three female family generations side portrait

They’re changing nappies at one end of the age spectrum and attending specialist appointments at the other. They’re booking childcare and organising aged care assessments—sometimes on the same day. And they’re doing it all while trying to hold down a job.

Welcome to The Care Squeeze—a growing crisis that’s quietly reshaping Australian family life.

The reality is now getting national attention thanks to the ABC’s recent series, The Care Squeeze, which shines a spotlight on the hidden cost of unpaid care and the people living it every day.

The hidden workforce holding it all together

According to the ABC analysis, around 1.5 million Australians are now part of what’s known as the sandwich generation — those caring for both their children and ageing parents at the same time. The emotional, financial and logistical toll is immense, and as the population ages, it’s only getting worse.

While Australia’s aged care and childcare systems struggle under staffing shortages, escalating costs and regulatory reform, it’s these middle-aged carers—most of them women—who are filling the gaps. Often unpaid, usually exhausted, and largely unsupported.

Episodes of The Care Squeeze revealed real-life stories: families using annual leave to transport parents to medical appointments, people reducing work hours or declining promotions to manage care, and caregivers dipping into savings just to afford temporary respite. This invisible workforce is the glue in a system that’s quietly cracking.

A crisis with gendered consequences

The care squeeze is not gender-neutral. Women are overwhelmingly the ones who take on these dual responsibilities, at significant personal and professional cost.

As The Care Squeeze highlighted, carers in this group are more likely to experience burnout, reduced income, and long-term career disruption. And it’s not just anecdotal: Treasury modelling shows that supporting unpaid carers to remain in the workforce could add tens of billions to the economy — yet policies remain fragmented.

The case for systemic support

This isn’t just a personal juggling act — it’s a structural failure. Australia’s care systems weren’t designed for multi-generational dependency under one roof. Childcare is expensive and hard to access. Home care is waitlisted. Residential care is often viewed as a last resort rather than an integral part of a continuum of support.

We need to stop treating carers as collateral damage in an overstretched system. Paid carer leave, more accessible respite, affordable childcare, and flexible workplace policies are no longer “nice to have” — they’re essential infrastructure.

We must rethink what care means

At its core, the care squeeze is a story about time, identity, and invisible labour. But it’s also a wake-up call: the way we think about ageing, parenting, and working must evolve.

A society that values care must also support its carers — not just with praise, but with policy. Until that happens, 1.5 million Australians will keep doing the impossible — juggling care for the people who raised them, and the little people they’re raising in turn.

Because love may be infinite, but time and energy are not.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

“I’d come home and cry”: Putting palliative care in the spotlight to improve services

New end-of-life care initiatives and research studies have been announced around the country, emphasising the focus needed on this often challenging time for both patients and their loved ones. Read More

Tom Gleisner’s debut musical on life in aged care in theatres now

Television host and screenwriter, Tom Gleisner has channelled his creativity into combatting ageism with his new musical about aged care, Bloom. Read More

Why this Brisbane grandmother refused higher offers to ensure young couple bought her home

A widow who lived in the same home for 50 years and raised her four children there, has refused offers from buyers who intended to demolish the house. Instead, she accepted a lower offer from a young couple who promised to maintain the home and look after the garden. Read More
Advertisement