Nov 15, 2017

Elderly Residents Out of Home as Controversial Retirement Village Closes

A number of elderly people will find themselves without a home this Christmas as retirement village Berkeley Living in Patterson Lakes is forced to close later this month.

City of Kingston in Melbourne’s south-east said that the village was too “dangerous” for people to reside in.

When the local council inspected the properties, it was found that some had no smoke detectors or fire equipment.

It was reported that owners of units at the retirement village with given fines and building repair costs in excess of $500,000.

As the owners of the units do not have the finances to pay and carry out the necessary repairs, the facility will be forced to turn off all its utilities on 30 November.

Some of the 16 affected residents include some who are in their 90s, along with one quadriplegic resident and another with Alzheimer’s.

This isn’t the first time Berkley Living have been in trouble. In mid-September, staff walked off the job amidst claims that they had not been paid in months.

One staff member said that he was owed about $12,000 in unpaid wages.

Other claims include, cook only getting paid $200 for two or three days a week, while other staff were getting less than $10 an hour.

The Berkeley Living facility is already under scrutiny as their current director is Deyar Musa, a 25-year-old man who was convicted of drug possession in 2016.

Other scandals include Berkeley Living’s connection with former aged care magnate Stephen Snowden, who is a convicted criminal, bankrupt and rumoured to have ties with underworld figures.

Snowden’s Cambridge Aged Care was previously was under investigation from the Department of Health and the Victorian Coroner for substandard care.

And until June 2012, Cambridge was providing welfare services to Berkeley retirement village, including meals and support services.

It was previously reported that more than 30 families, who had apartments in the retirement village and later sold to new owners when the resident left or died, never received any of the sale proceeds.

According to Fairfax media, many of the residents have managed to find alternative residences in light of the forced closure – but there are still some who remain at their units.

And it is currently unknown where they will go. Though some residents are reluctant to leave, it’s believed that the local council will help them find alternative accommodation.

What do you have to say? Comment, share and like below.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

What are the barriers to consumer directed care?

Aged care staff and organisations are faced with a number of challenges to providing consumer choice and control.  While delivering our Resident at the Centre of Care (RCC) Program, which trains staff to implement Consumer Directed Care (CDC), we learned much about the barriers to delivering CDC in residential aged care. Residents may fear being... Read More

What is the “Montessori” Approach to Dementia?

In the past few years, there has been great evolutions in dementia care. Nowadays there is more focus on patient centered care, alternative treatments for dementia symptoms, and a better understand of how to treat and communicate with people who live with dementia. One innovative method that has taken off is Montessori – a framework... Read More

Short-staffed home care providers call on families to help deliver care

Home care providers are asking family members to provide nursing care and administer medication amid massive staff shortages due to rocketing COVID-19 cases. Read More
Advertisement
Exit mobile version