Mar 14, 2019

Should There Be A National Registry For Carers in the Aged Care Industry?

Let’s make one thing very clear right from the start, carers are the most undervalued, overworked, and important cog in the aged care industry.

Socially, nurses have long been the recipients of praise and admiration for the hard work and personal touch involved with their jobs, but unfortunately, those who do the bulk of the groundwork in the aged care industry are not afforded this level of acclaim.

Carers are the ones who take on the responsibility of doing some of the more intrusive tasks that require a high level of professionalism and humility in order to assure that an elderly person can feel dignified in what could be described as a potentially embarrassing or humiliating situation.

Nobody wants to soil themselves as an adult, and it takes a special person to not only clean that mess, but do so in a way that allows a resident to still feel like a valued adult.

Showering, feeding, clothing and cleaning a resident, are just a handful of the tasks that a carer takes responsibility for on any given day, and they are also most the most likely person to be holding a hand or giving a hug to a an elderly person that needs it.

And that’s why it’s so important that carers are people of the highest moral character.

Given that carers spend more time with elderly residents than anyone else, along with the obvious vulnerabilities of people within the elderly age group, it would seem extremely logical for carers to have to join a national registry similar to the ones that nurses, doctors, and other medical professionals do.

But, unfortunately, this is currently not the case, and this makes it extremely difficult for aged care employers to be able to verify the character and employment history of the carers that they hire.

Example

Dana Gray is a former aged care employee who was charged with assaulting an 85-year-old woman at an Estia facility in Epping in April last year.

Ms. Gray’s case was particularly concerning given the level of violence, and one glance at the disturbing secret camera footage of Ms. Gray slapping and throttling an elderly resident is indication enough that this person is someone who should never have the opportunity to care for an elderly person ever again.

But had there been a national registry for carers in the aged care industry, she may not have had the chance to commit this horrible crime in the first place.

Following the horrible incident, Estia Health released a statement to the media where former Estia CEO, Norah Barlow, highlighted the potential benefits of having an organisation that licensed and registered all aged care workers.

“There is no single solution to stamping out elder abuse, but this case reinforces Estia’s call for a national register to identify people who should not be working in aged care.

“While aged care providers can take action against inappropriate behaviour, there is currently no way of knowing with any certainty whether a prospective employee has a history of behaving inappropriately.

“A national register of aged care workers will show exactly where someone has worked, for how long, whether they have been dismissed and the circumstances of their dismissal,” said Mrs. Barlow.

Current Standards

As it currently stands, only the aged care employees who are classed as health professionals are the employees that are held to a standard involving licensing and registration, and carers within the aged care sector do not currently fall into this category.

Nurses in the aged care sector are currently licensed and regulated by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) which ensures that all nurses meet a minimum standard of education, and also allows prospective employers to adequately check their nursing work history.

Annie Butler, Federal Secretary for the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, spoke with HelloCare and outlined her thoughts and the thoughts on the ANMF on the potential licensing of carers in the aged care industry.

“The ANMF has a long held position that care workers in the aged care industry should be licensed,” said Annie.

“The system that AHPRA runs, and there is a national law that sets out the regulation for all health professionals, the key purpose of that is the protection of public safety, so that’s what you’re trying to achieve when you license a worker, and there are increasing calls for this, especially since the announcement of the Royal Commission.”

There are many benefits when introducing this level of accountability, firstly, people have to meet a number of minimum standards, including certainty around minimum standards of education, training, and qualification.

There is also a vital layer of security that is provided by having a system that allows for background checks and work-history information.

“There are some carer’s out there right now with very minimal training, and there may even be some who have no training whatsoever. There will be some who have been to really good organisations who have a good quality of care worker training behind them,” said Annie.

“Some of these people may have gone out and paid for their own courses hoping to appropriately educated, and have not been equipped with the skills that they need, and you can’t fault someone for that.”

“The real benefit of licensing is that if people don’t meet the required standards there is a mechanism for checking that and holding people to account.”

Paul Gilbert, Assistant Secretary for the Victorian branch of the ANMF echoed the sentiments of his colleague and identified the level of risk that having unlicensed and unregistered carers can potentially pose.

“Self-evidently this does expose aged care residents to a potential for harm,” said Paul.

“It is possible for any person who isn’t registered to move from one employer to another despite being found to be unsuitable. Indeed someone could work at two facilities and lose their position at one facility, and the other not be aware that this has occurred.”

“Nurses are required to report annually regarding any police matters, including charges for which they are yet to be found guilty, and the Board can suspend or limit a nurses capacity to work. Carers are required to periodically provide a police check.”

“The focus should be on what is best for the public, in this case, those receiving care in our commonwealth funded residential services.”

“Whether it is a nurse providing nursing care, or a personal care worker or assistant in nursing providing nursing care, the nature of nursing care demands that minimum standards exist for all, and be applied equitably, for the protection of the public.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. This is a great idea. It would weed out the types of people that should never have been employed to work in aged care in the first place Anglo and foureign. But as long as aged care employment is to open to virtually hiring anyone it would be a fabulous idea to register aged care staff. As it is, it is too easy for facities to disregard the person’s experience and background and most often than not employees are friends and family or married which causes a conflict of interest in many instances especially when you are married to a CM or Registered Nurse. Things get pushed under the carpet when something goes wrong and the bias is extraordinary which often than not puts the elderly at risk due to the nature of “family with benifits”! Cares don’t get done properly. The extra care just isn’t there! Most of the family and friends that come on board are foreigners with very little experience in care. But what the heck hey? Who cares right? It is only the elderly. They don’t mind if you can’t speak audible English. Wrong! They do! And they prefer people who speak and understand their history. Someone that they can talk to on familiar tops that only someone that has a history here can do. In a perfect world hey? Aged care facilities take advantage of the low wages and lack of experienced staff to whom they seem to employ mostly foreigners. Well if they are are offered subsidies from the government or are sponsored by the company employing them they have them by the short and curlies. And most don’t join unions incase it effects their chances of residency. Contributing to a lack of representation in aged care facities. There you are. If anyone is really serious about fixing aged care, start with who and why some are employed in the sector. Apart from being warned yrs ago that foureign workers will stop wage growth and standards would go down I don’t see this country solvi g the issues in nursing and aged care all over the country or doing the right thing by anyone whether foureign or Anglo. Up the anti in every business so all are respected and Australia can then hold their head up to no more exploitation in certain industries.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Aged Care Commission appoints Chief Clinical Advisor

The Australian Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission has appointed Dr Melanie Wroth as its first Chief Clinical Advisor. Commissioner Janet Anderson said Dr Wroth, who has an extensive background in geriatric medicine, will provide expert clinical advice to Commission staff and also assist aged care providers to source and access guidance on best practice... Read More

“What’s the point of reaccreditation?”

Once unannounced visits are introduced, reaccreditation may no longer be necessary, suggests Kate Carnell, lead author of the Review of National Aged Care Quality Regulatory Processes report. Speaking at the Criterion Aged Care Reform After the 2018 Federal Budget Conference, Ms Carnell said, “I can’t for the life of me see what the point is... Read More

Australian Medical Association warned State Government that Aged Care Graduates were “Unemployable”

The aged care sector is in need of more quality staff to meet the growing population of aged care residents. This is reportedly something that South Australia is struggling with as The Australian Medical Association warned the State Government that half of aged-care graduates were “unemployable”. This warning, of the substandard training at TAFE SA,... Read More
Advertisement