Palliative Care – The Struggle Between Dignity and Distress

When discussing palliative care, the most common patients that people imagine are cancer patients.

However, palliative care is not exclusively just for cancer patients – it’s for any kind of terminal illness.

One study looked to find four non-cancer populations that might benefit from a palliative approach.

What was found was that people with ALS, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), End-stage renal disease (ESRD) and the frail elderly were underserved by palliative care, despite facing unique challenges as they reach the end of life stage.

In doing so, the researchers compare the presence and patterns of dignity related distress across these diverse clinical populations.

Each of the populations revealed unique and distinct patterns of physical, psychological and existential distress.

Patients with ALS reported more dignity related distress such as not being able to fulfill important roles, tasks or daily routines.

They often felt like a burden to others, or experienced feelings of loss of control and no longer feeling worthwhile or valued.

People with COPD reported having similar kinds of distress as hospice patients with advanced cancer.

These patients were most likely to experience physically distressing symptoms and predictably, the highest intensity of shortness of breath. These patients suffered their intensity and frequency of anxiety were highest

Patients with ESRD were the only group that included patients with moderate to severe suicidal thoughts. These patients also reported the highest number of comorbidities and prominent symptom burden.

The frequency of depression or loss of hope suggests that suicidal ideation may be driven by physical, more so than psychological factors

In particular, the elderly, in an aged care setting, were found to be lacking in access to palliative care services. This is often because this group of people are not considered to be “terminally ill”.

The frail elderly are different to the other three groups here, in that rather than being defined on the basis of illness, they were defined on the basis of age and frailty.

These four groups, when compared to cancer, tend to have less certainty in terms of prognosis. It was found that moderate to severe loss of sense of dignity did not differ significantly across the four study populations.

And for many people at the end of life stages of those conditions, there can often be a combination of uncertainty and denial which may stop them from approaching or using palliative services.

What do you have to say? Comment, share and like below.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Aged Care Minister claims algorithm doesn’t replace assessors. Workers say that’s not true

Sam Rae says the IAT algorithm does not replace assessors. Frontline workers say they cannot override it. So who is telling the truth? Clinicians across Australia are speaking out about what is really happening inside aged care assessments. Read More

Why nutrition is central to independence under Support at Home

The Support at Home program, which commenced on 1 November 2025, is transforming in-home aged care by prioritising measurable outcomes in areas like nutrition, independence and overall wellbeing for older Australians. Read More

Price gouging or policy failure? Aged care CEO fires back at Butler’s combative language

Operating margins of $1.44 per client day. EBITDA levels described as "not investable." And yet the public message from Canberra is that providers are gouging older Australians. Frank Price says the numbers tell a very different story. Read More
Advertisement
Exit mobile version