Feb 23, 2021

People with learning disabilities slapped with ‘do not resuscitate’ orders

At the peak of the United Kingdom’s COVID-19 outbreaks, doctors were faced with the appalling situation of having to choose which patients will receive life-saving mechanical ventilation.

They had two options. 

One, they could consider if the patient had ‘do not resuscitate’ orders in place, as some guidelines for public health emergencies said anyone with DNR status could be excluded from getting ventilators or other life-saving healthcare.

The second option was to exclude groups of people for which resuscitation might be futile or harmful, such as patients who score poorly on frailty tests.

Of course, the devil was in the detail, and when it came to implementing these impossible choices it has emerged, following an enquiry by the UK’s Care Quality Commission, that ‘blanket decisions’ were made about DNR orders related to some people with learning disabilities who score on some measures as ‘frail’.

It became apparent that some people with learning disabilities had DNR orders imposed on them, regardless of their wishes or needs, and without their knowledge or consent.

“It is unacceptable for decisions to be applied to groups of people of any description,” the CQC wrote in its report.

The CQC has continued to investigate the matter, and is expected to release a report within weeks.

The Guardian is now reporting that people with learning disabilities have continued to have DNRs placed on their files, even after the CQC’s damning findings.

Mencap, a UK charity that supports people with a learning disability, is calling on the government to prioritise people with learning disabilities during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

Dan Scorer, head of policy at Mencap, said, “People with a learning disability have long been forgotten and discriminated against, and never more so than in this crisis. 

“They have died at greater rates, had Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders slapped on their files and suffered through severe isolation. 

“The services and support they rely on have been removed and their physical and mental health has suffered – many are struggling to cope.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

COVID-19 response cost lives in aged care

An independent review of Australia’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has found that older Australians should have been better protected against the virus, as “fault lines” within the health and aged care sector were painfully exposed. Read More

Budget shows promising steps to reforming sector, but there’s more to do

The cries of aged care peak bodies, unions and workers have been heard as the Federal Government allocates $3.9 billion of the October Federal Budget towards reforming the aged care sector. Read More

Advice for older Australians at work

People aged 70 and over, people aged 65 years and over with chronic medical conditions and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people over the age of 50 with one or more chronic medical condition are at greater risk of serious illness if they are infected with coronavirus (COVID-19). For these reasons, the National Cabinet has... Read More
Advertisement
Exit mobile version