Death is inevitable, and in a civilised society everyone deserves a good one. It would therefore be logical to expect aged-care homes would provide superior end-of-life care. But sadly, palliative care options are often better for those living outside residential aged care than those in it.
More than a quarter of a million older Australians live in residential aged care, but few choose to be there, few consider it their “home”, and most will die there after living there for an average 2.6 years. These are vulnerable older people who have been placed in residential aged care when they can no longer be cared for at home.
The royal commission has made a forceful and sustained criticism of the quality of aged care. Its final report, released this week, and the interim report last year variously described the sector as “cruel”, “uncaring”, “harmful”, “woefully inadequate” and in need of major reform.
Quality end-of-life care, including access to specialist palliative care, is a significant part of the inadequacy highlighted by the report’s damning findings. This ranked alongside dementia, challenging behaviours and mental health as the most crucial issues facing the sector.
In truth, we have already known about the palliative care problem for years. In 2017 the Productivity Commission reported that end-of-life care in residential aged care needs to be better resourced and delivered by skilled staff, to match the quality of care available to other Australians.
This inequality and evident discrimination against aged-care residents is all the more disappointing when we consider these residents are among those Australians most likely to find themselves in need of quality end-of-life care.
The royal commission’s final report acknowledges these inadequacies and addresses them in 12 of its 148 recommendations. Among them are recommendations to:
Palliative care is provided to someone with an active, progressive, advanced disease, who has little or no prospect of cure and who is expected to die. Its primary goal is to optimise the quality of life for that person and their family.
End-of-life care is provided by palliative care services in the final few weeks of life, in which a patient with a life-limiting illness is rapidly approaching death. This also extends to bereavement care for family and loved ones.
Unlike in other sectors of Australian society, where palliative care services are growing in line with overall population ageing, palliative care services in residential aged care have been declining.
Funding restrictions in Australian aged-care homes means palliative care is typically only recommended to residents during the final few weeks or even days of their life.
Read more:
What is palliative care? A patient’s journey through the system
Some 70% of Australians say they would prefer to die at home, surrounded by loved ones, with symptoms managed and comfort the only goal. So if residential aged care is truly a resident’s home, then extensive palliative and end-of-life care should be available, and not limited just to the very end.
Fortunately, the royal commission has heard the clarion call for attention to ensuring older Australians have as good a death as possible, as shown by the fact that a full dozen of the recommendations reflect the need for quality end-of-life care.
Moreover, the very first recommendation — which calls for a new Aged Care Act — will hopefully spur the drafting of legislation that endorses high-quality palliative care rather than maintaining the taboo around explicitly mentioning death.
Of course, without a clear understanding of how close death is, and open conversation, planning for the final months of life cannot even begin. So providing good-quality care also means we need to get better at calculating prognosis and learn better ways to convey this information in a way that leads to being able to make a plan for comfort and support, both for the individual and their loved ones.
Advanced care planning makes a significant difference in the quality of end-of-life care by understanding and supporting individual choices through open conversation. This gives the individual the care they want, and lessens the emotional toll on family. It is simply the case that failing to plan is planning to fail.
We need to break down the discomfort around telling people they’re dying. The unpredictability of disease progression, particularly in conditions that involve frailty or dementia, makes it hard for health professionals to determine when exactly palliative care will be needed and how to talk about it with different cultural groups.
Read more:
Passed away, kicked the bucket, pushing up daisies – the many ways we don’t talk about death
These conversations need to be held through the aged-care sector to overcome policy and regulation issues, funding shortfalls and workforce knowledge and expertise.
We need a broader vision for how we care for vulnerable Australians coming to the end of a long life. It is not just an issue for health professionals and residential care providers, but for the whole of society. Hopefully the royal commission’s recommendations will breathe life into end-of-life care into aged care in Australia.
Davina Porock, Professor of Nursing, Director of Centre for Research in Aged Care, Edith Cowan University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Excellent article from Professor Porock – resonates with my personal experience with my mother in aged care. My mother’s end of life was unimaginable neglect from nursing home.
So important to highlight the failings & what HAS to be done from here.
Thank you.
this so true .u do advance care directive
A good article Davina and I am in full agreement.
The funding will only kick in in the last few days and very often, due to the current ACFI business rules, we can’t claim the subsidy. In my 30 years in the industry and since the ACFI funding model introduced , I was able to claim the palliative care funding on couple of occasions only but yet have facilitated end of life care on hundreds of occasions.
One of the other significant challenge is that many residents and representatives are reluctant to talk about the end of life. In many cultures, especially the European, such discussion is inappropriate and accordingly, one cannot plan.
Here at the Italian Village Fremantle, we do intensive education (residents and representatives as well as staff) and couple of years ago we introduced the end of life discussion on admission. This has resulted in an amazing cooperation amongst residents and their representatives and afford our clinicians the opportunity to plan. We are now known for our exceptional end of life care. We frequently receive referrals from the hospice and multiple hospitals, in some cases, in the last few days of palliation.
We enjoy the support of the palliative care team. Their work and the education they provide is second to none.
In summary, yes, the end of life funding is very often unavailable and or inaccessible but there is no excuse for not providing quality end of life care and dignified death.
The Commonwealth could promote the above by simply relaxing the criteria for claiming the ACFI Question 12 in respect to palliative care. This does not require any changes to the funding instrument but rather to its interpretation and application.
A great article in many levels.
It is time for a new national course for all EEN’s inclusive.
With IT available Teleconferencing means no Aged Care facility should be left without a consult from a trained MO specialising in Palliative and End-of-Life care.
Excellent article. Food for policy makers. End of life care is incredibly under-serviced & neglected.