What is the difference between retirement living and aged care?

The retirement living and aged care industries often get mixed up, so what’s the difference? [Source: Shutterstock]

Choosing where we live is driven by many factors, including lifestyle, affordability, work or family. As we get older, our outlook can be informed by challenges associated with health and ageing, which might require a move into a retirement village or aged care facility.  

Understanding the differences between the two is critical because they are not the same thing.  

Retirement communities are specifically designed to foster a sense of belonging and connection which brings a host of benefits, such as reducing isolation and improving mental well-being.  

By contrast, the primary focus of nursing homes (also known as aged care facilities or residential aged care) is about providing care and keeping residents safe.  

There are currently 250,000 people around the country living in one of 2,500 retirement communities, which are suited to older Australians who want to live independently in their own homes for as long as possible – but with the benefits of community living.   

Nursing homes, on the other hand, are suited for individuals who can no longer live independently and need care and support around the clock. 

Both play a critical role within the housing ecosystem but for very different reasons.  

A two-bedroom unit in a retirement community is on average 48% more affordable than the equivalent median house in the same postcode – and most villages are effectively full.  

Services, facilities and on-site support vary too. Some retirement communities offer gyms, libraries, golf or bowling greens, theatres, on-site concierge and 24-hour emergency assistance, funded by residents rather than taxpayers.  

We should encourage age-friendly housing that improves mental health and well-being while minimising trips and falls, leading to fewer visits to the doctor. The benefits for consumers and Governments are compelling.  

Retirement communities provide better housing that leads to better health outcomes for older Australians.  

Knowing the difference between the two is becoming more critical, especially since there are currently two million Australians aged over 75 – a cohort growing by 70% over the next two decades.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Other nations innovate to include seniors in society — Australia refuses to learn

Did you know that in Singapore, families receive housing grants to live near older relatives, keeping seniors socially connected and cared for? This is just one of the world-leading strategies Australia chooses to ignore. Read More

Older Australians Warned About Shingles Risk

As we get older, our risk of developing diseases such as shingles increases. It is estimated over 120,000 new cases of shingles are reported annually in Australia and the substantial burden of shingles in Australia is continuing to increase over time, most prominently in the older population. Shingles is caused by the varicella zoster virus,... Read More

“Oakden Puts Governments and Australian Aged Care On Notice”: Aged Care Minister

This week’s release of South Australia’s Independent Commissioner Against Corruption’s report on the disgraced Oakden facility represents a warning to all people associated with the governance and management of Australia’s aged care sector. Commissioner Bruce Lander QC has put all of us on notice including Ministers, governments, managers, administrators, aged care providers and health care... Read More
Advertisement
Exit mobile version