What is the difference between retirement living and aged care?

The retirement living and aged care industries often get mixed up, so what’s the difference? [Source: Shutterstock]

Choosing where we live is driven by many factors, including lifestyle, affordability, work or family. As we get older, our outlook can be informed by challenges associated with health and ageing, which might require a move into a retirement village or aged care facility.  

Understanding the differences between the two is critical because they are not the same thing.  

Retirement communities are specifically designed to foster a sense of belonging and connection which brings a host of benefits, such as reducing isolation and improving mental well-being.  

By contrast, the primary focus of nursing homes (also known as aged care facilities or residential aged care) is about providing care and keeping residents safe.  

There are currently 250,000 people around the country living in one of 2,500 retirement communities, which are suited to older Australians who want to live independently in their own homes for as long as possible – but with the benefits of community living.   

Nursing homes, on the other hand, are suited for individuals who can no longer live independently and need care and support around the clock. 

Both play a critical role within the housing ecosystem but for very different reasons.  

A two-bedroom unit in a retirement community is on average 48% more affordable than the equivalent median house in the same postcode – and most villages are effectively full.  

Services, facilities and on-site support vary too. Some retirement communities offer gyms, libraries, golf or bowling greens, theatres, on-site concierge and 24-hour emergency assistance, funded by residents rather than taxpayers.  

We should encourage age-friendly housing that improves mental health and well-being while minimising trips and falls, leading to fewer visits to the doctor. The benefits for consumers and Governments are compelling.  

Retirement communities provide better housing that leads to better health outcomes for older Australians.  

Knowing the difference between the two is becoming more critical, especially since there are currently two million Australians aged over 75 – a cohort growing by 70% over the next two decades.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

So you’re thinking of going into a nursing home? Here’s what you’ll have to pay for

By Laura Davy, UNSW This week at the aged care royal commission hearings, the CEOs of three aged care providers called for a change in the way residential aged care is funded to improve the quality of care. This followed a plea from Aged Care Services Australia for the government and opposition to address what... Read More

Diwali: How the festival of lights casts a shadow on aged care rostering

As one in five aged care workers now comes from a South Asian background, Diwali’s impact on staffing rivals that of Christmas. Discover how providers are responding with inclusive, data-driven approaches to support both culture and care. Read More

Let’s get real: Should clients self-manage their Home Care Package?

  The appeal of self-management in the Home Care Packages Program is understandable. Older people have been looking after themselves and others for a long time, and most want to remain in the driver’s seat.  Self-managed Home Care Package providers advertise that they offer more choice, more control, more hours and more freedom – all... Read More
Advertisement
Exit mobile version