Feb 22, 2022

Younger residents in aged care facilities has dropped by 20 per cent

Young resident in nursing home

The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) has released its latest data which shows an encouraging trend. The Australian assessed that in the 12 months leading up to September 2021, Australians under 65 residing permanently in residential aged care facilities dropped from 4,600 to 3,700, a decline of 20%. Those aged under 45 living in aged care facilities declined by 24%, lowering from 120 to 91.

Further into the AIHW findings are the sub-groups underpinning the numbers. Of the younger persons residing permanently in aged care facilities – many have experienced catastrophic injury or are living with a severe disability – these groups also saw a drop in numbers in aged care facilities across each state and territory. 

“The Australian government has set targets to have no people under the age of 45 living in residential aged care by 2022, and under the age of 65 by 2025, other than in exceptional circumstances,” AIHW spokeswoman Louise York conveyed. 

Core to the decline in numbers is that a reduced amount of persons aged under 65 are taking up permanent residence in aged care settings. 

Between July and September 2021, only 151 people aged under 65 entered permanent residential facilities, a 30% decline from the same period of time the previous year. 

Highlighting a policy move that has become one of the core facets of the government’s approach to aged care, the interim report from October 2019 issued by the aged care royal commission overseen by Lynell Briggs and Tony Pagone, clearly advanced the need for “immediate action to stop the flow of younger people with a disability going into aged care, and speed up the process of getting out those young people who are already in aged care”.

This call contributed to the formation of a five-year government initiative announced in September 2020. 

As of September 2021, males made up 53% of younger people residing in aged care facilities. 

Furthermore, 2% were between the ages of 18 and 44, while six in 10 fell between the ages of 60 and 64.

Around 10% of those under the age of 65 identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islanders.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Are there really 20% less under 65s in residential care or have we been tricked by the government again?

    As response to the royal commission the government announced that no person under 65 will be living in aged care…..

    What they meant was that no one under 65 will be living in a nursing home under the aged care Act.
    Just another deception, there are many under 65s still in the same place, in the same bed etc but now under the NDIS Act.

    That’s what is described as deceptive practice. The only thing that has changed is the documentation, it’s a bit different, considerably convoluted and time consuming and no compensation for the increased workload that is required for the government to dupe the public.
    On the other hand,there have been some under 65s now not living in facilities. NDIS has steadily rehoused the very easy to care for and left the hard work to the facility.

    More misdirected and more reason to distrust this government that has failed to provide adequate funding for the safe and sustainable delivery of care to elderly nursing home residents.

Banner Banner
Banner Banner

Alleged Abusive Carer Walks Free On Bail

A paid personal carer from Queensland by the name of Michelle Leanne Stitt was granted bail yesterday on charges that included causing grievous bodily harm and severely neglecting a 77-year-old woman that was in her care. Ms. Stitt is alleged to have failed to provide the elderly woman with the necessities of life for more... Read More

Is it better to use bed rails or low beds with sensor mats?

Bed rails are used less often in aged care because of tighter regulation and an awareness of their risks, but using low beds with sensor mats has its own risks. Read More

Government’s $1.6 billion home care package not what it seems

  The Government and the Opposition are debating whether or not the budget contained ‘new’ money for aged care, or if funds have simply been redirected from residential care to more popular home care. The Labor party has criticised the Government’s $5 billion aged care package for simply reallocating funds from residential care to more... Read More
Banner Banner