Stories and media coverage of poor quality aged care has become far too frequent, raising the question on what can be done to improve the state of aged care in Australia.
Both the community and the industry talk of more training, more staff and more funding, but one of the most basic things that existing staff and residents need is more time.
Earlier this year, the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) released the National Aged Care Staffing and Skill Mix Project Report which stated that aged care residents were a only receiving two hours and 50 minutes of nursing care every day.
This is considerably less than the recommended four hours and 18 minutes that the ANMF report suggested for aged care residents.
The report suggests this comes down to one thing – poor staffing numbers. Because of a lack of aged care staff and nurses, many residents miss out on needed time for their care.
In fact, it was calculated that they were missing out on approximately one hour and 28 minutes on average each day.
As published in QNMU’s Inscope Journal, time could be the difference between poor and good care – tasks such as nursing, showering, feeding, personal hygiene could be better done in those extra 88 minutes.
And with better care, there is also a decrease in the chance of falls, weight loss, dehydration and pressure sores.
See what a difference 88 minutes can make.
Aged care workers and nurses say that having more time for their resident would make a world of difference to not only them, but the resident and their families.
QNMU aged care member Pam* said an extra 88 minutes would be a ‘godsend’.
“Eighty-eight minutes per resident is the difference between doing the best you can and doing everything they need,” she said.
“I could get more people showered and I could spend time with them, trimming their nails — even spending a few minutes talking with them rather than rushing through the tasks and dashing off to the next resident.
“It’s about that personal contact — that’s when you notice things, you are more attuned to their condition and you can identify changes a lot earlier and pass that on to the RN.”
Another member, Mau*, said short staffing led to unreasonable schedules which is unfair to the residents. More time would mean a huge improvement in the quality of life for the residents.
“I could keep on top of nail trimming and brushing teeth which would be great. I often don’t get a chance to do more than a couple at a time.”
She said she’d also take more time with residents who need help eating, “some of these people take half an hour to eat a meal and if I’d like to let them eat at their own pace.
“But sometimes you don’t get a choice, it’s like an assembly line and it’s awful.”
Mau also said that it’s not just the residents that need more time, but the new staff too, “at the moment, because we are so short staffed, sometimes they get only one buddy shift before they have to strike out on their own,” she said.
“It’s nowhere near enough and one shift doesn’t cover off on all the different areas of the facility and the differing needs of the residents… so you can get someone who has never worked in dementia going in cold.
“That’s a recipe for disaster — it’s bad for the residents and for the new carer, and the chances of something being overlooked, something serious, is real.”
Both Pam and Mau said they loved their jobs and found the work rewarding, but at the same time they were worried that they were letting the residents down.
“You come home feeling guilty and heartbroken because you can’t do any more for these lovely people and you think ‘am I in the right job?’,” Mau said.
There are a number of aspects that need to change in order to get better care for aged care residents. This includes, staffing, training, wages, better standards, just to name a few.
So where is the best place to begin? QNMU’s report recommends:
* Names have been changed for privacy reasons
What do you have to say? Comment, share and like below.
1
5
Well those aged care facilities where residents receive 2+ hours of care per 8 hour shift are doing great guns. where my husband works there are 4 staff for 54 residents – most high care so that make the time for care less than an hour each for every thing including documentation. and it will get WORSE if the new ACFI proposed changes are brought into being. Less money = less staff regardless of a ration. A ration mandated would be a great start to better care and more contact though.