Feb 26, 2018

“Strict staff ratios for childcare”, but what about our elderly?

Many of the issues that people raise in terms of aged care could potentially be solved if there were stricter staff ratios.

Feedback on rushed mealtimes, skipped teeth brushing, overmedicating to the point of sedation, leave much to be desired with quality of care.

It’s been suggested that it’s the severe understaffing and under regulation of aged care facilities that has lead elderly Australians to not receive the care and treatment they need.

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF), is calling on federal politicians to make staffing ratios in aged care law – to protect vulnerable, older Australians.

“Enough is enough,” says Annie Butler, ANMF’s Assistant Federal Secretary.

After a meeting in Brisbane last week, Federal Executive unanimously passed a special resolution.

The resolution stated;

“The ANMF will soon be launching a national public awareness campaign calling for ratios in aged care to be made law now.  The voices of this campaign will be 6 individuals currently in the aged care system, a registered nurse, assistant in nursing, resident, family member, doctor and community supporter. This public campaign will about the experiences of real people in the aged care system, and why they say staffing is inadequate and must be addressed as a matter of urgency.”

The national campaign aims to sends a strong message to the country’s politicians – that it’s “time to fix aged care for the sake of elderly nursing home residents and their families”.

“Australia has strict staff ratios for childcare, which is only fair and reasonable. But in aged care, it’s a very different story, where just 1 registered nurse may be responsible for managing the care of more than 100 residents.”

“There are no mandated ratios for aged care and no laws to ensure our elderly get the care they need.”

“Our Aged Care system has been ignored by governments for far too long and today the ANMF calls on federal politicians to stand-up for older Australians and support making ratios law in aged care.”

Ms Butler acknowledged Senator Hinch for his ongoing fight to place the issue of inadequate staffing in aged care on the parliamentary agenda.

Last September, Senator Derryn Hinch introduced the Aged Care Amendment (Ratio of Skilled Staff to Care Recipients Bill 2017), which aims to ensure that safe, quality care is provided to residents in aged care homes.

“Unfortunately, many of these Australians who have given so much to society are highly vulnerable, and are not currently guaranteed the standard of care they deserve within our aged care facilities,” said Senator Hinch at the time.

“The passage of this Bill would be an important step in moving towards an aged care system that is more focused on the protection of the elderly than on profit margins of aged care facilities.”

What do you have to say? Comment, share and like below.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I fully understand where everyone sits on Ratio’s in aged care. however until the politicians see aged care as ” a worth while vote” It won’t happen they learnt with Acute care and with Child care the funding is not forthcoming. I would love to see a positive change.

  2. There also needs to be a mandate on the ratio of Personal Care Workers to residents. Nursing Home operators and the government seem to forget that as people age they are going to need more time and attention to ensure their daily needs are properly met. From observations in my mother’s nursing home, registered nurses play little part in helping with feeding, bathing, dressing, toileting etc. or even spending time to chat and socialise which in the end becomes the resident’s only activity as their ability to mobilise and partake of group activities becomes less and less but they still need some sort of social interaction to keep their spirits up.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Dementia is incurable and fatal. So why is voluntary assisted dying off the table?

Why is voluntary assisted dying an option for someone with cancer but not for someone with dementia? Consent is the sticking point, but countries around the world have found very different ways through it. From advance directives to capacity-only laws, here’s what they do, and what Australia could still learn from them. Read More

The silent mental health cost of leading through Support at Home reform

Behind every Support at Home transition sits a leadership team carrying enormous risk. Constant reform shifts, system instability and rising participant frustration are taking a silent mental health toll on CEOs and Boards across aged care. Read More

800,000 older Australians, eight cents in the dollar: Why the CHSP is worth saving

The CHSP costs eight cents in every aged care dollar and supports 838,000 older Australians. Support at Home costs 30 to 50 per cent more per hour of service. The government wants to replace one with the other. Read More
Advertisement
Exit mobile version