Sep 23, 2019

Confounding fees hide the great aged care swindle

As a nation, we’re watching on as a royal commission investigates the quality and safety of our aged care system amid allegations of widespread corruption and abuse.

In the shadows of the investigation’s more arresting revelations, a lesser-known story, though equally important, has begun to unfold.

Under the radar, elderly and disabled Australians are being left vulnerable to exploitation by the businesses that are meant to provide for their needs. Many recipients of My Aged Care are being short-changed and bamboozled by some service providers hiding exorbitant costs behind byzantine pricing and a bevy of indeterminate add-ons.

Across the board, the differences in costs are stark. At the highest level of care, the more scrupulous providers will charge recipients a reasonable 13 per cent of their total government subsidy in administration fees. At the other end of the spectrum, some providers are charging up to 38 per cent for the very same administrative burden.

This translates to much less money being left over for crucial personal care and services. To put it in perspective, those paying 13 per cent could afford to pay for up to 38 hours of personalised care a fortnight, while those paying 38 per cent could afford roughly 20 hours of crucial services such as nursing, cleaning or gardening; that’s about half the care because they weren’t equipped at the outset to make the best choice.

Some might argue buyer beware. Unfortunately, some providers have done a masterful job of clouding their costs. They make it near-impossible to spot the poisoned apple without first taking a bite. As a result, comparing plans is a painstaking and labyrinthine process.

Providers understand that once a client is locked in to their plan, they are unlikely to shop around for alternatives because the process is long and arduous.

Despite impending legislation compelling all providers to publish their rates, some still don’t.

Some providers are trying to set a benchmark in clarity by rolling their management fee, basic daily fee and care management into a single, intelligible, all-encompassing figure.

But most providers prefer to break their fees into as many categories and sub-categories as possible, muddying the waters for prospective members and making it difficult to compare costs across the vast platform of options.

We can’t allow elderly and disabled Australians to be swindled and taken advantage of as they brace themselves for the most challenging phase of their life. They deserve better. If we’re going to allow the most marginalised Australians to reclaim their dignity, the home-care industry must follow the lead of the services that are setting the benchmark with clear, simple and affordable plans.

Danielle Ballantine is the chief executive of Your Side, a non-denominational, not-for-profit health and home-care provider.

This article was first published by the Sydney Morning Herald and has been republished with Ms Ballantine’s permission.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Australia’s Aged Care Workforce: Are We Ready To Meet The Demand Ahead?

Aged care is a booming industry. And there is one main reason why this is the case – people are living longer. The UN predicts that by 2030, one in six people will be over the age of 60. With so many more potential clients and residents for aged care, what does this mean for... Read More

“I Wish We Had Someone Like You Here”

In the first half of this year, Meaningful Ageing Australia is offering seminars in regional locations across Australia. Each host organisation chooses a topic that meets the learning needs of their staff. The majority of hosts have chosen ‘Spiritual Care in a Diverse World’, ‘Supporting Older People in the Transition to Aged Care’ or ‘Death,... Read More

Three pads a day: should there be a limit on continence aids?

We have heard stories of rationing of continence pads to three per day, with extra pads being kept in locked away in cupboards, and requests for more denied. Aged care staff revealed their experiences with the rationing. Aged care worker Wayne Beasley said, “People would get an allocation of three. There was a pad room, and... Read More
Advertisement
Exit mobile version