HelloCare Exclusive – part 2 in a series of 4. Click here to read part 1.
The Australian Aged Care Workforce Strategy Taskforce was established last year to better support those who perform the important work of caring for our elderly. Aged care is one of the fastest growing job markets – the Productivity Commission estimates Australia will need almost one million aged care staff by 2050. Making aged care a pathway to a fulfilling, valued career is just one of the priorities for the strategy, which I will be submitting to the Minister for Aged Care by 30 June.
In my previous article – the first in this series of four – I wrote about the Taskforce’s community consultations, our strategies to address the negative stigmas attached to ageing, about developing an industry code of practise, and I explained how we can create a culture of continuous feedback and improvement in aged care.
In this article I look at four proposed actions that are aimed at developing new career pathways in the rapidly evolving and expanding aged care industry:
We need to reframe the qualifications and skills framework in the aged care industry to address current and future skills requirements. This work is fundamental to building the aged care workforce of the future, and focuses on two key building blocks:
The first building block has been examined in detail by one of the Taskforce subject matter experts, Korn Ferry Hay Group. They analysed current job roles by examining the know-how, problem solving and accountability features of the jobs in home care, residential care, and remote locations.
We have examined three key roles:
All three are essential to the effective delivery of aged care outcomes, irrespective of the setting. Each has a separate and clear role to play. For example, in looking at the roles of nurses it is apparent they need to work to their full scope of practice. The industry can benefit from their holistic nursing skills working as part of a team and developing their roles in relation to cognitive and functional health.
One of the key insights that we, as an industry, have been discussing is the key role played by personal care workers, who make up the majority of our workforce. Put simply, they are undervalued, which has meant that attraction and retention is now a critical issue across the industry.
The Taskforce has examined public perceptions and complaints about workforce competencies, and has identified fundamental gaps in areas such as functional health, dementia and medication management.
The evidence available to us enabled the Taskforce to identify the competency gaps that need to be addressed as part of modernising workforce education and training. This is the second building block, and has been a focus of the Taskforce with the Department of Education and Training.
The education system, across both vocational education and training and higher education, needs to keep pace with the industry to ensure an adaptable, highly-skilled workforce that supports the growth and evolution of the aged care industry. Education and training options need to be flexible, ‘fit-for-purpose’ and respond to support workers and industry in our changing environment.
To achieve strong and active jobs and career paths, we will need to define, develop and implement as a priority a new national qualification and training framework, specific to the aged care industry, that includes:
We turned to how this might be done, and started by forming a specific-purpose Aged Services Industry Reference Committee (IRC). The most urgent objective of the IRC will be to examine current competency standards in VET aged care training packages to address skills gaps, and to configure pathways to support career progression. The IRC will also look at the aged care training provided by the tertiary system.
Professor John Pollaers. Image supplied.
Defining new career pathways, including looking at how the workforce is accredited, is a priority. The existing organisational structures and role designs in aged care do not allow for realistic career progression.
The work undertaken for the Taskforce on job definitions and pathways shows there are several pathways that can be opened up.
Our consultation reinforced the industry is struggling to find the right balance between clinical expertise and managerial skills resulting in suboptimal, poorly defined and extremely stretched managerial roles which are increasingly difficult to staff.
Personal care workers need greater recognition. We also need to recognise some may simply want to be recognised for their skills and move horizontally, for example, by taking on a mentoring role or in-house training roles.
There are new and enhanced roles emerging in the workforce that will add to career progression and variation – examples include: care coordination or care team leaders to support consumers and families, and involving liaison and navigation across systems and industries. There is also the need for a family liaison role.
Making headway on attraction and retention depends on many of the other strategic areas.
Industry leaders must have a full and frank discussion about the factors affecting the attractiveness of the industry and retention of employees.
We are all familiar with the challenges:
We need to re-profile how we describe the industry, the work and the jobs – with clarity. In so doing, we need to make clear the scope for taking on complex work and leadership roles (such as for nurses). We need to build on the strengths of this industry – for example, its attractiveness for volunteers such as community volunteers or former health professionals.
The performance amongst providers across the country in creating and supporting talent pipelines for entry into aged care work has been patchy.
The industry needs to convey more effectively – and in a united way − the potential variety and quality of the work. For example:
We also need to ensure fit-for-purpose and differentiated approaches to address the challenges that regional, rural and remote locations have in attracting and retaining their workforces.
The industry also needs to make sure it is attracting the right workers with the right aptitudes and competency requirements.
Our wide definition of the workforce covers the Australian Government’s workforce which supports and interacts with providers, consumers and state/territory governments. People in this workforce really do matter, because they all have significant touchpoints with consumers, and they are integral to the consumer experience and care outcomes. They have a very real impact on the community’s perception of aged care and the industry.
We will need to consider and continue to invest in these workforces which have clear training and competency development needs, and where people with the right aptitudes need to be recruited.
There are also dependencies with the Department of Human Services, the Department of Social Services and the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, making the Government’s aged care workforce a whole-of government issue, not just a Health portfolio issue.
These workers also need to understand and appreciate the importance of their role.
Look out for John’s third article in HelloCare, which will examine promoting access to the right care, looking at a new industry standard for workforce planning, strengthening the interface between primary/acute care and aged care, and establishing a Remote Accord.
By Professor John Pollaers
As a workforce planner in the Aged Care sector, I agree with points made in this article, however, feel compelled to report that one of the most horrifying realities facing providers looking to appoint new staff to the sector, is the reliance on RTOs. I have heard from many candidates currently completing their training, that there is a zero failure approach taken for candidates being pushed through by external agencies and correct answers are given to students regardless of their competencies or interest in the sector. Keeping in mind that in a CDC environment, frontline staff are your brand ambassadors the need to identify care staff who have the empathy and drive to deliver care is critical for any provider. Investing in training those not invested in caring for others, will have a detrimental impact on service provision.
Extremely crucial and valid point Victoria. As an AIN who CHOOSES to work in this industry, it is widespread the carers who are only there because its a wage, some are over here on work visas that cant even speak english but are hired because of incentives for the provider. RTO’S offering the course over 6-12wks and completely funded by the govt is attracting the wrong people into aged care.
I also feel it critical that there needs to be a big shake up within managerial roles of Providers.
If we are to look at improving staff retention, it is vital the one of the major reasons why carers, that choose to be in this in this field, the ones who are highly skilled and competent are the very ones, that are leaving the industry in increasing numbers for that very reason, needs to be investigated and taken seriously.
Care staff on a daily basis are not receiving any support or appreciation from those in Management. Bullying is evident and an attitide of being superior to everyone else is rife! Care workers are mentally and emotionally drained from the huge lack of support and unethical work standards from those in Managerial roles. Treatment of staff is very much a feeling of being micro-managed. Their concerns and issues are falling on deaf ears, they are at the frontline of caring for our elders yet they are treated and looked at as insignificant.
I understand not every workplace is like this and there are many leaders in management who do the right thing, treat their staff with respect, and care about their wellbeing. Care workers desperately need people in managerial roles who will provide leadership, who appreciate and care about them, encourage them to be the best they can be and to stand beside them , not in front of them up on their pedalstal dictating if improving staff retention and job satifaction is to be achieved.
Victoria and Danni, Your points are well made and are very consistent with the findings of the Taskforce. Each of the points made are addressed by the 15 strategic action recommendations made by the Taskforce. Ultimately it will be up to industry and government to execute these actions, however I am pleased to say that each of the industry Peak bodies have given their commitment to do so. Cheers John
As the national peak body, the Continence Foundation of Australia is well placed to provide assistance in the development of an aged care workforce that is able to effectively promote the maintenance of continence in the elderly as well as educate the workforce regarding best practice support for those managing incontinence.
We would like to see greater emphasis placed on this key quality of life condition that can be prevented or better managed. We would like to see continence content included in ALL aged care education courses and welcome the opportunity to be actively engaged in this process.