Palliative Care – The Struggle Between Dignity and Distress

When discussing palliative care, the most common patients that people imagine are cancer patients.

However, palliative care is not exclusively just for cancer patients – it’s for any kind of terminal illness.

One study looked to find four non-cancer populations that might benefit from a palliative approach.

What was found was that people with ALS, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), End-stage renal disease (ESRD) and the frail elderly were underserved by palliative care, despite facing unique challenges as they reach the end of life stage.

In doing so, the researchers compare the presence and patterns of dignity related distress across these diverse clinical populations.

Each of the populations revealed unique and distinct patterns of physical, psychological and existential distress.

Patients with ALS reported more dignity related distress such as not being able to fulfill important roles, tasks or daily routines.

They often felt like a burden to others, or experienced feelings of loss of control and no longer feeling worthwhile or valued.

People with COPD reported having similar kinds of distress as hospice patients with advanced cancer.

These patients were most likely to experience physically distressing symptoms and predictably, the highest intensity of shortness of breath. These patients suffered their intensity and frequency of anxiety were highest

Patients with ESRD were the only group that included patients with moderate to severe suicidal thoughts. These patients also reported the highest number of comorbidities and prominent symptom burden.

The frequency of depression or loss of hope suggests that suicidal ideation may be driven by physical, more so than psychological factors

In particular, the elderly, in an aged care setting, were found to be lacking in access to palliative care services. This is often because this group of people are not considered to be “terminally ill”.

The frail elderly are different to the other three groups here, in that rather than being defined on the basis of illness, they were defined on the basis of age and frailty.

These four groups, when compared to cancer, tend to have less certainty in terms of prognosis. It was found that moderate to severe loss of sense of dignity did not differ significantly across the four study populations.

And for many people at the end of life stages of those conditions, there can often be a combination of uncertainty and denial which may stop them from approaching or using palliative services.

What do you have to say? Comment, share and like below.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Innovative thinking in aged care can provide good outcomes, royal commission hears

On the fifth day of the Sydney hearing, the royal commission heard from a panel of aged care executives who shared their experiences and suggestions for ways to provide high-quality care. The panel consisted of executives from three of Australia’s most progressive and innovative aged care providers: Group Homes Australia, Brightwater Care Group, and Glenview.... Read More

Support at Home: What the new pricing guidance means for home care

The Australian Government has released new pricing guidance for Support at Home. Discover what you’ll pay for home care services from 1 July 2025, like $100/hour for personal care. Read More

Distinguished professor neglected in nursing home, royal commission hears

The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety hearings in Hobart this week have focused on two aged care facilities operated by Southern Cross Care Tasmania, Yaraandoo and Glenara Lakes. The forensic case study has revealed dangerous medication mismanagement, neglect, poor leadership, and staff shortages. The focus has been on the governance practices of... Read More
Advertisement