Nov 19, 2021

Working from home may be used as loophole to marginalise workers with disabilities

Working from home may be used as loophole to marginalise workers with disabilities

An audience member of the ABC’s Q+A program, who spoke out about her daughter’s treatment by an employer, has highlighted how businesses can discriminate against people with disabilities under the guise of working from home.

Q+A audience member Lisa Burns addressed a panel discussing flexible working arrangements and illustrated how OH&S concerns from her daughter’s employer have impacted her quality of life.

“Her psychologist considers her capable of working and able to work from an office, however, her employers have requested that she work from home due to a fall from a chair where she hit her head – this was the result of a seizure.”

The concerned mother then went on to detail the devastating social implications that working from home has had on her daughter.

“She no longer takes public transport and she doesn’t chat with her co-workers. She sits on the couch at home and works.”

The concerned mother added, “She’s with NDIS, she’s funded to work 16 to 22 hours a week … but if she’s told that she can’t work sitting on a chair, where can she work? Where is her future? She’s 22.”

She also noted that working from home has also enhanced the lives of some people living with disabilities, but expressed grave concern that a lack of choice in this regard would further marginalise others. 

Disability advocate Eliza Hull was the first panel member to address Ms Burns concerns and labelled the treatment of her daughter as outright ‘discrimination’.

“That’s purely discrimination. She should be allowed to work there. I mean, it’s different if we’re in lockdown and we all have to work from home, but once we all start to move back – it should be a choice,” said Ms Hull.

“I think that for a lot of people with disability, when the lockdown hit, it was really hard to start suddenly working from home and not have that connection and community.”

Also in attendance as a Q+A panel member, was Telstra CEO, Andy Penn, who pointed to Telstra’s hiring process and reframing of management roles as an example of ways that businesses can be more inclusive of people with disabilities.

“To try and improve our neurodiversity within Telstra, we’ve changed our recruitment process so that we don’t necessarily go through the normal interviewing process for people who have particular mental conditions and challenges that they have to deal with,” said Mr Penn.

Mr Penn added, “You’ve just got to reverse the onus of the obligation.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Psychology Explains Why Some Older People Worry So Much

Have you ever caught yourself in a worry spiral? It’s different to regular worrying. Regular worrying is being concerned about something, like if your partner is ok while they are sick with the flu. A worry spiral is more like an avalanche, all the smaller worries build up on top of each other until they... Read More

Why Being Conscious of Death and Dying Can Make Us Live Better

Imagine that you’re 70, you’re still living independently and you’ve lived a very healthy life. You have always tended to your garden, which you are proud of, and you’re conscious of the environment without being a “greenie”. And then you find out that when you pass, you’ll have to go into a coffin that was... Read More

Assisted dying referendum: people at the end of their lives say it offers a ‘good death’

Having the option of assisted dying available if they needed it often appeals to the terminally ill. It guarantees what they understand to be a good death, including being able to choose the timing and way they die. Read More
Advertisement