Feb 14, 2020

What’s The Point Of A Royal Commission If The Government Isn’t Listening?

When the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety’s Interim Report was released last October, Aged Care Minister Richard Colbeck’s claim that he was “shocked” by the report was troubling, to say the least.

The Interim Report, titled Neglect, was both candid and scathing in its assessment of the Australian aged care sector, but all of the issues raised within the report’s findings have been well documented over the years and are common knowledge to industry insiders.

Research from the Dieticians Association of Australia contained within the Interim Report estimated that somewhere between 22-50% of people living in residential aged care are malnourished.

But when questioned by NSW Senator Kristina Keneally during yesterday’s Senate Question Time, it seemed Minister Colbeck was unaware of this alarming statistic.

“I haven’t had that particular statistic put forward to me specifically,” said Mr. Colbeck, “I don’t believe if that is the case, I don’t believe if that’s the case.”

Mr. Colbeck’s bumbling and uninformed response is merely one of a long list of red flags by the Morrison Government who, from a public perspective, seems uninterested in improving the state of the aged care industry.

Shadow Minister for Ageing and Seniors, Julie Collins MP, shared her concerns regarding the Morrison Government and Minister Colbeck with HelloCare earlier today.

“How can anyone have any faith in the Minister’s ability to respond to the Royal Commission’s final recommendations when it seems he hasn’t even read the interim report? This statistic was shocking and should have been pretty memorable,” said Ms Collins.

 “It does not reflect well on the Minister or the Government that he is not aware, or doesn’t believe, the shockingly high rates of malnutrition in aged care.”

The announcement of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety in late 2018 was a relief to many Australian families and industry insiders who were aware of the poor state of aged care in this country. 

But the government’s inability to adequately respond, and willingness to stifle any attempt to bring more transparency to the sector have destroyed the faith of a public who hoped that the Royal Commission would be a catalyst for meaningful and positive change.

Earlier this week the federal government blocked an amendment to new laws that could have forced aged care providers to reveal how much they spend on food and staff and how much of their funding goes to parent organisations.

The government’s reasoning for voting against moves for transparency in the sector have always revolved around the notion of waiting for the Royal Commission’s final report before making any major reforms.

However, that did not stop the Government from putting the publicly-funded Aged Care Assessment system out to tender, which is nothing short of ridiculous when you consider the potential for conflict of interest it creates.

Making people who sell aged care services responsible for assessing what services an older person needs is basically like giving your bank account details to a used car salesman and asking them to pick the car for you.

A recent poll on HelloCare revealed that 91% of our audience believes that the Royal Commission will not result in any real improvements to aged care, and when you look at the incestuous swamp of familiar faces that influence decision making, it’s hard to disagree.

“It is hardly surprising the Government is not supportive of measures to improve transparency in aged care,” said Ms. Collins.

“Scott Morrison has no plan to fix the crisis in Australia’s aged care system, but he does have a plan to privatise aged care assessments. This makes no sense.”

“The Morrison Government is allergic to transparency and is loose with the truth.”

The hopes of our rapidly ageing nation hinge on the intentions of a government that is more interested in the appeasing lobbyists and corporations in the aged care industry than improving the lives of older people.

Anyone waiting for meaningful change would not be advised to hold their breath.


Photo courtesy of iStock: credit Spiderstock

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Great article Jakob. Clearly, Senator Colbeck is not up to the job if he doesn’t read or understand the Interim Report. Maybe he should wear the “neglect” tab along with all the others who bring the aged care sector into disrepute.

  2. Hello

    I have an idea, maybe a silly one ,but just a thought. Most aged care facilities have buses. So ambulent and semi-ambulant, could be taken to federal members office, to see and hear direct from resident about there life in an aged care facilitie. This could be coordinated with other local facilities to unite, showing unity to press the case for the residents, that all have in common, bring quality dignified care/conditions in there home, there home, that is also a commercial aged care facility. This could have the potential to start an action movement, with of cause the media on hand to show it’s time for action. Just a thought. Would be interested in your view on this approach. 

    Shaun Rogerson. 

  3. We as members of our communities have a responsibility and duty of care to watch out and be a voice against any social injustice incurred on others that are vulnerable including older people . Australians please stand up and flood this Royal Commision with submissions . We need a campaign called “hit send” , send a submission , send an email to Government, Ministers and all your local MP’s. #OlderPeopleMatter and we need to be beside them as a voice , now more than ever .

Banner Banner

Doll therapy: Is there a place for it in our nursing homes?

A controversial therapy option is gaining increasing popularity among nursing homes and even home care.  For elderly patients who have cognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer’s, caregivers and medical professionals have found some potential benefits in a therapy technique known as Doll Therapy. Although some controversy lies in this therapy method, government studies are showing growing... Read More

Over-70s may be instructed to self-isolate for months

  The British government could instruct people over 70 to stay at home in strict isolation until July in a plan being considered by the government and expected to be implemented in the coming weeks. The proposal raises the question, how can we help older friends and family if they become, either by government decision... Read More

“A slow and painful journey”: Why did it take over 20 years to approve the new Alzheimer’s drug?

There’s considerable support from patient groups and many doctors and scientists for the early approval of this drug, but there are some who don’t agree with this decision. Read More
Banner Banner